Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Philosophy
In reply to the discussion: Is it possible to exist outside ideology? [View all]ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)26. Apprehension is one aspect of the imagination.
Symbols don't have inherent meanings. We have to imagine to interpret their meanings. I think memory is a function if the imagination.
There is a language called English, but you claimed the people were English. How do we detect English as a human trait? Is English a property of matter?
"There was violence."
Yes, that's another description of the events, and the violence was objective fact.
Yes, that's another description of the events, and the violence was objective fact.
We agree on this.
"People were walking on atoms that were grouped in a way that we call dirt, grass, rocks, etc."
Yes, the land being colonized was real, just as were the colonizers. That you want to call that land "atoms" is your predilection but is no more valid than others who call dirt 'dirt'.
My description here was to avoid using the social construct of countries, states, etc.
"the laws were strictly imaginary"
In my *opinion* you are again misusing the term "imaginary". Reciting a meme. But then, my opinion is just imaginary (right?) and so not real? Not composed of your "atoms"?
In my *opinion* you are again misusing the term "imaginary". Reciting a meme. But then, my opinion is just imaginary (right?) and so not real? Not composed of your "atoms"?
A thought of a unicorn is a real thought, even if unicorns are not real. So your opinion is a real opinion.
Where do the laws exist? I think they exist solely within the imagination.
What if instead of saying things like "laws and countries only exist within the imagination," I said they exist "solely within the mind?" Perhaps my understanding of the imagination doesn't match the psychiatric understanding. If we agree they exist within the mind, then we would know which scientific discipline to use to examine the situation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations