Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Silver Gaia

(4,998 posts)
2. True. But this sounds more like eclecticism.
Sun Aug 18, 2013, 03:28 AM
Aug 2013

Eclecticism in religious practice--picking and choosing from a number of faiths to come up with a personal practice--is a pretty new phenomenon.

Syncretism is more broad-based--like, for instance, when African Yoruba traditions brought by slaves combined with Catholic traditions to eventually create new religious traditions like Santeria, Voudou, and Candomble in the Caribbean and Brazil that are each shared by a community of believers.

This eclectic attitude toward religion is more inclined toward personal practice, so it isn't likely to end up creating whole new syncretized traditions practiced by many people, but simply a multitude of personal practices tailored to individuals.

I think that's what the article is getting at, too--that the people doing this are not becoming members of multiple religious communities, but are forging their own paths using practices from multiple faiths as their foundation. So, in a sense, projecting into the future, this trend could eventually change the nature of religion as a community of people with shared beliefs to something of a more solitary nature.

It makes me think of these words that we hear a lot these days: "I'm spiritual, but not religious."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Belonging to Multiple Rel...»Reply #2