Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: Richard Dawkins: Atheism’s asset or liability? Post 20 has a new story from RNS. [View all]Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)30. I haven't edited anything
I should have used "orientation." You're right.
I am still confused as to why "baby" is homophobic. I even tried searching it to see if I was missing something. "Sissy baby" came up and, if that is what was said, I would agree with it being homophobic. But it wasn't what was said. If I'm missing something, though, I'd appreciate a link for a head's up so that I don't continue with something that is a slur.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Richard Dawkins: Atheism’s asset or liability? Post 20 has a new story from RNS. [View all]
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
OP
i think both believers and atheists often feel looked down on by the other side.
Htom Sirveaux
Aug 2014
#1
For the record I did not alert but the post was not civil and you must be civil in this room.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#14
I'm not going to parse anti-gay slurs with you but I will give you something to read.
rug
Aug 2014
#32
I guess I didn't read the worm reference as homophobic but I could be wrong.
Goblinmonger
Aug 2014
#37