Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: Labels? [View all]kentauros
(29,414 posts)43. I said no such thing.
Quote me if you need to. Whereas, I have to assume you mean my reply to you in the locked thread, re the following:
Neither you nor el_bryanto have violated the SOP, but I would ask that you both take it to PM, where this entire threadjack should have gone, too.
and assume you are referencing el_bryanto's post to you in that same thread, re:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12643738#post38
38. Hey it's great to have you over here to lecture us
Why don't you stick to your own forum?
Atheists already have the AA forum and the Religion forum to shit on believers - do you really need this forum too?
Bryant
38. Hey it's great to have you over here to lecture us
Why don't you stick to your own forum?
Atheists already have the AA forum and the Religion forum to shit on believers - do you really need this forum too?
Bryant
I will admit that it's borderline on the civility, yet still not close enough to warrant a hide or a warning.
So I will reiterate, as much as I hate having to hammer this again and again:
Neither you nor el_bryanto have violated the SOP, but I would ask that you both take it to PM, where this entire threadjack should have gone, too.
I think we've explained ourselves enough. This isn't the Religion group where it's downright expected for players to go round and round arguing the same little bit back and forth while ignoring the entirety of the original post.
Stop arguing semantics or I'll have to shut this one down, too! Take it to PM where it belongs.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
I agree. I notice as my faith cuanges and grows thst labels don't pinpoint my faith completely.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#1
Interesting question. I would have never used the term "idolize" re a personal label
No Vested Interest
Aug 2014
#12
I believe the term refers to an atheist who thinks that some atheists are too harsh on believers
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#17
That's possibly the origin of the term; but obviously it's being applied wider than that. nt
el_bryanto
Aug 2014
#22
You camd in here knowing fullwellwhat might happen and started trashing the place.
hrmjustin
Aug 2014
#35
Labels can be handy, but a given label can cover a multitude of differences
Fortinbras Armstrong
Aug 2014
#57