Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: Why I'd Still Believe In God Even if the Bible Was a Fairytale [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)40. Here.
"I don't believe your god exists"
"Your god does not exist."
These two sentences are very different. The first says what I think about a claim (god exists). It says I don't believe the claim. It doesn't say your god doesn't exist. It says I don't believe your claim that said god exists.
The second statement is a positive claim. It isn't a statement about what you said or what you believe, it is a statement about your god itself, in the negative. That second claim carries burden of proof. It IS equal to the positive claim 'XYZ god(s) exist'.
As I said, that's why I don't use it. (keeping in mind the exceptions I mentioned.)
"I don't believe your god exists" is absolutely not equal in burden to "god exists".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well some people are just as certain there is no God as those who say there is.
hrmjustin
Oct 2014
#12
As host of this room I ask you to self-delete your comment and reread the sop of this room.
hrmjustin
Oct 2014
#14
You completely misunderstood everything I just said, and reversed the meaning.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2014
#39