Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

In reply to the discussion: The deluded argument. [View all]
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
15. I got the same feeling that there was at least one who made this mentally ill argument that would
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 09:04 AM
Nov 2014

Have us committed.

The deluded argument. [View all] hrmjustin Nov 2014 OP
I don't hold very much hope for finding common ground with such a narrow and judgmental POV NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #1
Yes! I think several who make this argument enjoy making it and don't care about any feelings they hrmjustin Nov 2014 #12
You have been known to make statements about the mental health of atheists. cbayer Nov 2014 #36
Actually, I think a review of my replies of that nature.... NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #44
I don't recall them exactly, but I am sure you are portraying the posts cbayer Nov 2014 #46
If I wanted to combat this argument ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #2
Thank you and welcome to the interfaith room my friend. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #13
I like this, but there is a potential flaw I would ask that you address. cbayer Nov 2014 #37
"Delusional is believing in something for which there is not evidence" ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #50
Elegant. rug Nov 2014 #54
That is generally the approach I take. cbayer Nov 2014 #56
"revert to a position that they are using delusional in a colloquial, not clinical, way" ZombieHorde Nov 2014 #63
Very interesting take on that. One I had not considered. cbayer Nov 2014 #64
Ah, yes, the colloquial definition, as opposed to the formal one Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2014 #87
I don't feel any need to combat such arguments. It's merely an opinion, and No Vested Interest Nov 2014 #3
Part of me agrees because I know I can't change opinions. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #14
Simple question. bvf Nov 2014 #4
Yes, you are. rug Nov 2014 #5
He already took it back. There couldn't be any less good faith here. cbayer Nov 2014 #38
My point is that the once the deluded argument comes than we see the mentally ill argument hrmjustin Nov 2014 #8
So you agree that bvf Nov 2014 #31
Yes they are distinct but I will be honest and say I don't care for either argument. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #32
No, of course you don't. rug Nov 2014 #33
It would depend on how it is used el_bryanto Nov 2014 #10
I got the same feeling that there was at least one who made this mentally ill argument that would hrmjustin Nov 2014 #15
This is completely laughable. You have taken a very clear position on this question. cbayer Nov 2014 #34
It's a weak argument and boils down to simple name-calling. rug Nov 2014 #6
"A delusion is a psychiatric disorder caused by a biological process." AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #7
I think you also have to acknowledge that some atheists are using the term el_bryanto Nov 2014 #11
Some may be. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #28
Some may be? Well i suppose the sins of ones own side are a lot harder to see. nt el_bryanto Nov 2014 #30
The only nonclinical definition is an insult. rug Nov 2014 #29
It is school yard stuff designed to hurt. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #16
This gets to the limits of an interfaith discussion el_bryanto Nov 2014 #18
I believe they should be able to say that as well but not in this room, lol. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #19
Well that's the limits of interfaith, as I stated above el_bryanto Nov 2014 #20
Yes this room is rather limiting in some ways but I kind if like that way. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #21
If you can't respect a belief you consider "wrong," okasha Nov 2014 #48
I am very friendly with a Sunni Muslim Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2014 #88
I know there is no way to 'police' it but TM99 Nov 2014 #22
Comparing it to both delusion and mental illness i agree el_bryanto Nov 2014 #26
I still disagree. TM99 Nov 2014 #27
I think there is some relatively innocuous colloquial use of the term by some members. cbayer Nov 2014 #39
I'm going to have to disagree. okasha Nov 2014 #73
I totally agree that some people are completely disingenuous when they claim cbayer Nov 2014 #81
You took the words right off my fingertjps. okasha Nov 2014 #41
It is a purposeful button-pusher. TM99 Nov 2014 #9
Yeah I doubt that we can convince them they are wrong but we can always present the hrmjustin Nov 2014 #17
It is designed to be hurtful. TM99 Nov 2014 #23
yes it needs to be called out more. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #24
I want to clarify something here. cbayer Nov 2014 #40
I think we might have to disagree somewhat on this. TM99 Nov 2014 #42
I agree with everything you say in your first paragraph, except cbayer Nov 2014 #43
We just disagree that's all. TM99 Nov 2014 #61
I think it's ok for us to agree to disagree. cbayer Nov 2014 #62
We may not disagree as much as you think. TM99 Nov 2014 #82
I'm not going to pass judgement on what you are doing other than to cbayer Nov 2014 #83
I respect your position. TM99 Nov 2014 #85
I greatly value your participation here. I hope you know that. cbayer Nov 2014 #86
Thank you. I never doubted it. nt TM99 Nov 2014 #89
In a recent thread of the 14 posters who responded only three responded by saying Leontius Nov 2014 #45
Oh, it's definitely not a small subset of those that responded to that thread cbayer Nov 2014 #47
And do you "diagnose" that the very many people on this site skepticscott Nov 2014 #106
This thread was not about Republicans so there would be no need to mention them. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #107
Host notice that requires your attention. MADem Nov 2014 #108
I didn't read it that way at all... TreasonousBastard Nov 2014 #109
kick. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #25
Even though I take a tremendous amount of heat for it, I challenge it. cbayer Nov 2014 #35
I agree. okasha Nov 2014 #53
Earning brownie points. He'll be in like Flynn anytime. cbayer Nov 2014 #58
Following a well-trodden path. okasha Nov 2014 #65
Anyone advancing such a position is arguing in bad faith (ad hominem) and can't be Common Sense Party Nov 2014 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author bvf Nov 2014 #51
Believers are not deluded. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #52
Why is he still here? cbayer Nov 2014 #57
I will contact the other hosts immediately. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #60
I wouldn't have so much of an issue but it's a hit and run participation el_bryanto Nov 2014 #66
Absolutely right. And he'll score even more points when he is blocked from here. cbayer Nov 2014 #67
I fully expect to be barred bvf Nov 2014 #93
The first sign of intellectual want is simple name-calling. rug Nov 2014 #98
For the record BVF is banned from this room. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #99
Thank you. He'll be collecting his brownie points and getting his promotion soon. cbayer Nov 2014 #100
I hope it is over. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #101
Banning people is sometimes necessary, particularly cbayer Nov 2014 #102
Thanks. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #103
When they pull this tag-team stunt, okasha Nov 2014 #104
Thanks my friend. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #105
When somebody says that, you'll be the first to know. rug Nov 2014 #55
I think this post is not in keeping with the sop of this room and as a host I remind you that hrmjustin Nov 2014 #59
With all due respect, bvf Nov 2014 #68
I think it best to self delete. Your goat question was not appreciated here. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #69
Done. bvf Nov 2014 #70
This is not an open room. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #71
Noted in full. n/t. bvf Nov 2014 #76
Thank you. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #77
If you want to "argue" you need to go over to the Religion forum. MADem Nov 2014 #72
This is a support group bvf Nov 2014 #78
More of a discussion group where people share experiences and perspectives MADem Nov 2014 #79
You must feel very clever with that one. I hope you don't tire yourself patting yourself on the el_bryanto Nov 2014 #80
Support group? Nice. Is Atheists & Agnostics a support group as well? cbayer Nov 2014 #84
MADem's description, not mine. n/t. bvf Nov 2014 #90
Unless you are speaking of some post somewhere else, kentauros Nov 2014 #91
Thanks for the helpful links. bvf Nov 2014 #92
Well, I see that, no matter what, kentauros Nov 2014 #94
You posted links bvf Nov 2014 #95
In your opinion are believers deluded? el_bryanto Nov 2014 #96
It is also a place that is supposed to be free of disruptive trolling cbayer Nov 2014 #97
Brassieres and athletic supporters are supportive as well! MADem Nov 2014 #111
Thanks for the guffaw! kentauros Nov 2014 #112
Don't skim when you read, it will end in tears. MADem Nov 2014 #110
Perhaps you have confused Interfaitb with the ASAH Group. okasha Nov 2014 #74
kicking. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #75
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»The deluded argument.»Reply #15