Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: The deluded argument. [View all]cbayer
(146,218 posts)64. Very interesting take on that. One I had not considered.
I would like to see this meme go away. It's hurtful and only used to demean others.
I appreciate your insights into the whole debate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't hold very much hope for finding common ground with such a narrow and judgmental POV
NYC_SKP
Nov 2014
#1
Yes! I think several who make this argument enjoy making it and don't care about any feelings they
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#12
"revert to a position that they are using delusional in a colloquial, not clinical, way"
ZombieHorde
Nov 2014
#63
I don't feel any need to combat such arguments. It's merely an opinion, and
No Vested Interest
Nov 2014
#3
My point is that the once the deluded argument comes than we see the mentally ill argument
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#8
Yes they are distinct but I will be honest and say I don't care for either argument.
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#32
I got the same feeling that there was at least one who made this mentally ill argument that would
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#15
This is completely laughable. You have taken a very clear position on this question.
cbayer
Nov 2014
#34
Some may be? Well i suppose the sins of ones own side are a lot harder to see. nt
el_bryanto
Nov 2014
#30
I think there is some relatively innocuous colloquial use of the term by some members.
cbayer
Nov 2014
#39
Yeah I doubt that we can convince them they are wrong but we can always present the
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#17
In a recent thread of the 14 posters who responded only three responded by saying
Leontius
Nov 2014
#45
This thread was not about Republicans so there would be no need to mention them.
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#107
Anyone advancing such a position is arguing in bad faith (ad hominem) and can't be
Common Sense Party
Nov 2014
#49
Absolutely right. And he'll score even more points when he is blocked from here.
cbayer
Nov 2014
#67
Thank you. He'll be collecting his brownie points and getting his promotion soon.
cbayer
Nov 2014
#100
I think this post is not in keeping with the sop of this room and as a host I remind you that
hrmjustin
Nov 2014
#59
You must feel very clever with that one. I hope you don't tire yourself patting yourself on the
el_bryanto
Nov 2014
#80