Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: We need to have a discussion about the rules [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)7. I am going to be very blunt.
The disruption was a damned fine example of 'militant atheism'.
An emotional and over the top response in a safe-haven is the very definition of this kind of militancy. Dare I say, it has been an invasion of militant atheists?
Plain and simple, just ban the individual and do so with any others that do the same kind of behavior. Rules are boundaries. Not enforcing them emboldens others to violate those boundaries.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it goes deeper than a discussion of the rules to what the purpose of this forum is
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#23
I don't agree that they have been patient enough. I think that people have been banned for
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#27
I'm not sure what part of my statement you don't buy. It seems we are on the same page
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#30
I don't buy that atheists are automatically antagonistic toward religion...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2014
#31
"friendly and respectful" would be far better than "tolerant" and "civil" and "positive" because
carolinayellowdog
Dec 2014
#44