Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
In reply to the discussion: We need to have a discussion about the rules [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,597 posts)12. Are we talking about the most recent post?
[font style="font-family:papyrus,'Brush Script MT','comic sans MS',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]I did not disrupt that post at all. I commented on what the OP posted. He discussed militant atheism and how some atheists champion the word and others use it as a slur.
My comments were related to that. If the OP wanted to focus on something else he/she could have simply said so instead of attacking me and my font choice (seriously?).
Would it have been so hard to simply say:[/font]
"you misunderstand, I mentioned X but I want to focus on Y?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it goes deeper than a discussion of the rules to what the purpose of this forum is
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#23
I don't agree that they have been patient enough. I think that people have been banned for
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#27
I'm not sure what part of my statement you don't buy. It seems we are on the same page
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#30
I don't buy that atheists are automatically antagonistic toward religion...
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2014
#31
"friendly and respectful" would be far better than "tolerant" and "civil" and "positive" because
carolinayellowdog
Dec 2014
#44