Interfaith Group

LostOne4Ever

(9,597 posts)

13. Was anyone hurt or threatened with acts of violence?

Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:04 AM

Dec 2014

Last edited Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:17 PM - Edit history (1)

[font style="font-family:papyrus,'Brush Script MT','comic sans MS',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]Then it is not [font style="font-family:'Brush Script MT',''Lucida handwriting','forte',cursive;" size=5 color=crimson]"militant atheism."[/font]

So a slur is used and I simply explain how why I consider it a slur and that is emotional or over the top? I ask you to reread my statement. It was not emotional or over the top. I feel I was fairly neutral in my response.

Does objecting, even if emotional, to a slur now count as extremism (using this word because I object to the other)? So are the LGBT group extremeist when they get upset about someone using a slur against them? The feminist groups? The various ethnic groups?

What rules did I break? Meanwhile the OP of the thread in question criticizes a type of non-belief (which is against the SOP) calling it authoritarian and a reptilian brain (dehumanizing an entire group) and for the act of speaking on my own behalf, calmly and rationally I deserve to be banned?

I was attacked for simply commenting on a post and I am the offending party? One of the hosts responds to my post with a hostile tone and I respond back calmly and it is me who is the problem?

Interfaith is supposed to be people of different religious traditions coming together and working for a bigger goal than themselves. Part of that is talking to each other and acknowledging our differences. Discussing things and trying not to offend each other. My comment was in that tradition.

But again, I am breaking the rules by following them?[/font]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

57 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need to have a discussion about the rules [View all] okasha Dec 2014 OP

I think we do need to rethink a few things in here. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #1

"...but we need to make clear that disruption is not permitted". ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #2

i hate banning people but it has become necessary at times. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #3

I understand, and would dislike doing so, too. ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #4

Yes this is true. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #6

Vandals. okasha Dec 2014 #9

I think one thing needs to be said. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #5

I am going to be very blunt. TM99 Dec 2014 #7

I agree. okasha Dec 2014 #10

You are mistaking Religion with interfaith LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #11

Was anyone hurt or threatened with acts of violence? LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #13

Come on. TM99 Dec 2014 #15

You and I have had civil conversations before LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #16

We have, however, I am not going back and forth with you. TM99 Dec 2014 #17

Then lets not go back and forth LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #18

I don't think it's a matter of belief or nonbelief. rug Dec 2014 #8

Are we talking about the most recent post? LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #12

Could there also be a discussion on personal attacks? LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #14

Don't take it personally. Comic Sans has that effect on people. rug Dec 2014 #19

Actually its papyrus LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #20

How about Infidel? rug Dec 2014 #21

I like that, might have to download it (nt) LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #22

I think it goes deeper than a discussion of the rules to what the purpose of this forum is el_bryanto Dec 2014 #23

I have used it as both myself. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #24

No one has been banned because s/he is an atheist. okasha Dec 2014 #26

I don't agree that they have been patient enough. I think that people have been banned for el_bryanto Dec 2014 #27

Well i can say all bans were done with all in agreement. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #28

I don't buy that... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #29

I'm not sure what part of my statement you don't buy. It seems we are on the same page el_bryanto Dec 2014 #30

I don't buy that atheists are automatically antagonistic toward religion... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #31

OK el_bryanto Dec 2014 #32

kicking. the discussion is important. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #25

Since Pinto has resigned as host in Religion, okasha Dec 2014 #33

Hopefully the nominstion process will go smoothly. i nominated TexasTowlie. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #34

We don't need to be discussing what happens in the RELIGION group here. Period. MADem Dec 2014 #51

Good points all, and thank you for voicing them. kentauros Dec 2014 #53

I agree, and the only way to keep TM99 Dec 2014 #57

Are you proposing that this group should begin to follow its SOP? eomer Dec 2014 #35

Did you come in here just to complain about us? Really? hrmjustin Dec 2014 #36

I came here to ask whether this group is considering following its SOP. eomer Dec 2014 #37

We do enforce our sop and you are welcome. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #38

Thanks for the warm welcome. eomer Dec 2014 #41

Enjoy. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #42

I think our SOP is just fine. okasha Dec 2014 #39

Well said okasha! Well said! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #40

I think the SOP is fine too, will try to live up to it when posting here. eomer Dec 2014 #46

Welcome back, eomer. okasha Dec 2014 #49

You must have been reading another group. I think it starts with "A". rug Dec 2014 #43

No, I was definitely reading this group. eomer Dec 2014 #45

That's a good plan. rug Dec 2014 #48

"friendly and respectful" would be far better than "tolerant" and "civil" and "positive" because carolinayellowdog Dec 2014 #44

Good to see you back, carolinayellowdog. okasha Dec 2014 #47

Interfaith dialogue, 1880s style carolinayellowdog Dec 2014 #55

Good to see you back my friend! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #50

Then they need to be shown the door. MADem Dec 2014 #52

I completely agree. TM99 Dec 2014 #56

It sounds like the religion forum is falling apart. el_bryanto Dec 2014 #54