Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

In reply to the discussion: "Militant" [View all]
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
35. I should have listened to the National Review.
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 08:44 AM
Dec 2014

Will Herberg, “‘Civil Rights’ and Violence: Who Are the Guilty Ones?”, The National Review Sept. 7th, 1965, pp. 769-770

It did not come easy for us in this country, under the weight of the vast influx of immigrants and the residual effects of the frontier tradition, to consolidate a secure internal order based on custom and respect for constituted authority; but finally we managed. This internal order is now in jeopardy; and it is in jeopardy because of the doings of such high-minded, self-righteous “children of light” as the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and his associates in the leadership of the “civil rights” movement. If you are looking for those ultimately responsible for the murder, arson, and looting in Los Angeles, look to them: they are the guilty ones, these apostles of “non-violence.”

For years now, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and his associates have been deliberately undermining the foundations of internal order in this country. With their rabble-rousing demagoguery, they have been cracking the “cake of custom” that holds us together. With their doctrine of “civil disobedience,” they have been teaching hundreds of thousands of Negroes — particularly the adolescents and the children — that it is perfectly alright to break the law and defy constituted authority if you are a Negro-with-a-grievance; in protest against injustice. And they have done more than talk. They have on occasion after occasion, in almost every part of the country, called out their mobs on the streets, promoted “school strikes,” sit-ins, lie-ins, in explicit violation of the law and in explicit defiance of the public authority. They have taught anarchy and chaos by word and deed — and, no doubt, with the best of intentions — and they have found apt pupils everywhere, with intentions not of the best. Sow the wind, and reap the whirlwind. But it is not they alone who reap it, but we as well; the entire nation.

It is worth noting that the worst victims of these high-minded rabble-rousers are not so much the hated whites, but the great mass of the Negro people themselves. The great mass of the Negro people cannot be blamed for the lawlessness and violence in Harlem, Chicago, Los Angeles, or elsewhere. All they want to do is what decent people everywhere want to do: make a living, raise a family, bring up their children as good citizens, with better advantages than they themselves ever had. The “civil rights” movement and the consequent lawlessness has well nigh shattered these hopes; not only because of the physical violence and insecurity, but above all because of the corruption and demoralization of the children, who have been lured away from the steady path of decency and self-government to the more exhilarating road of ‘demonstration’ — and rioting. An old friend of mine from Harlem put it to me after the riots last year: “For more than fifteen years we’ve worked our heads off to make something out of these boys. Now look at them–they’re turning into punks and hoodlums roaming the streets.

http://themoderatevoice.com/15520/recall-the-words-of-the-national-review/
"Militant" [View all] okasha Dec 2014 OP
Brava! rug Dec 2014 #1
That, too. okasha Dec 2014 #3
I had to look that up. rug Dec 2014 #5
Really? LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #12
You can not have it both ways. TM99 Dec 2014 #15
What was inappropriate about my manner? Honestly I don't see it LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #17
Really? cbayer Dec 2014 #18
Good post. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #2
Great! okasha Dec 2014 #6
No i am a marshmallow. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #8
"Moving water wears away stone." Lao Tse okasha Dec 2014 #9
And if you told someone that you consider a word a slur against you LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #14
And that is how you use the adjective "militant" kentauros Dec 2014 #4
Please go ahead and post it. okasha Dec 2014 #7
Well, I may have to rewrite it a bit, kentauros Dec 2014 #10
I am Asexual LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #13
"Religionista" is a made-up word, kentauros Dec 2014 #20
The rest of the world is mostly theist LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #21
Okay, now you've confused me. kentauros Dec 2014 #22
I am giving you an example of a word LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #23
We're not going to agree, kentauros Dec 2014 #24
Very well LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #25
Yes... LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #11
Let's start at the beginning okasha Dec 2014 #26
Okay LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #27
You know, I think you are probably a nice person IRL. cbayer Dec 2014 #28
Cbayer (long post) LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #32
I appreciate your post and have read it carefully. cbayer Dec 2014 #36
Alright LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #38
I think you can PM the hosts with your suggestions. cbayer Dec 2014 #39
Here's some militant Christians. stone space Dec 2014 #29
Militantly praying. okasha Dec 2014 #30
They aren't the only militants in the Berrigan family. Check out Frida's profile: stone space Dec 2014 #34
... LostOne4Ever Dec 2014 #33
What if atheists were defined by their actions? stone space Dec 2014 #40
These are the people I was raised by and with. cbayer Dec 2014 #37
That's understandable - being neighborly means avoiding using terms that offend others el_bryanto Dec 2014 #41
Militant atheist here. stone space Dec 2014 #16
Haven't you been instructed? okasha Dec 2014 #31
I should have listened to the National Review. stone space Dec 2014 #35
You can be whatever you choose to be and you do it well. cbayer Dec 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»"Militant"»Reply #35