Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Elizabeth Warren

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)

6. That's why I asked, actually.

Reply to rhett o rick (Reply #4)

Mon Oct 13, 2014, 11:22 AM

Oct 2014

I didn't know if this was a pro-Warren cartoon, or an anti-Warren cartoon making the claim that Warren was just as much dependent on finance types as anyone else. I think it would have been easier to spot as pro-Warren if the two guys weren't both in suits. (At least they look like suits to me.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Toon: Woman President [View all] n2doc Oct 2014 OP

Who are the two guys supposed to represent? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #1

Two guys who are not of the 1%. nt TBF Oct 2014 #3

Of course. If they were banksters they'd be high-fiving over H. Clinton. nm rhett o rick Oct 2014 #4

I guess they really represent many of us - TBF Oct 2014 #5

That's why I asked, actually. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #6

Zing! bigwillq Oct 2014 #7

*?* okay NBachers Oct 2014 #2