Elizabeth Warren
In reply to the discussion: Boston Globe Op Ed: Elizabeth Warren, run for the White House [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)"Derailing by attacking the messenger?" Since when is it an attack to let people know who the messenger is? Surely you don't support "willful ignorance."
The writer of the article and the merits of the article are inextricably linked, particularly since MOVEON has unsuccessfully been trying to convince Warren to run, and Warren's lawyer issued a letter telling them to stop fundraising on her behalf. So yeah, the "messenger" in this instance IS salient.
Here's the difference between you and me. I haven't said anything negative about Warren in this group. Why? I LIKE HER. I VOTED FOR HER. I SENT MONEY TO HER CAMPAIGN. I WORKED TO GET HER ELECTED. I'm on her mailing list, particularly when it comes to national defense issues.
That said, she has said, repeatedly, that she's not running. Is "the Warren Group" so insular and blinkered that they don't listen to the very person they claim to tout? Like it or not, her repeated refusals ARE an aspect of any hopes for a candidacy.
And, as I've said elsewhere and am happy to say again, if she's the nominee, I will happily vote for her, work for her, and donate to her effort. But so long as she is telling me that "No means no" I am going to believe her. I think she's a very smart woman, and she knows her own mind.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)