Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
5. This NYT article has some Easter eggs, too, and stinky ones.
Sat May 16, 2015, 11:02 PM
May 2015

"vituperations?" Really? Vituperations are vituperative comments.



vituperative
adjective vi·tu·per·a·tive \vī-ˈtü-p(ə rə-tiv, -pə-ˌrā-\
Definition of VITUPERATIVE
: uttering or given to censure : containing or characterized by verbal abuse
— vi·tu·per·a·tive·ly adverb


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vituperative

Some of us leftists may cheer verbal abuse of Wall Street, but the word carries a more negative connotation, as to the person doing the "verbal abusing," the person "given to" censure, or Warren, than does criticism or censure of Wall Street, which carries a negative connotation as to the object of the criticism or censure.


Yet it is Ms. Warren who has become the national face of opposition to Mr. Obama on the trade package.


News writing is supposed to use as few words as possible. She is opposing the TPP, but the wordier "To Mr. Obama on the trade package" makes her fight seem more personal than issue oriented.

Then, for comment, they turn to McCaskill, a conservadem and a Hillary supporter who actually made a face when asked by someone on MSNBC if Hillary were copying from Warren and claimed that Hillary had espoused liberal policies years before anyone had heard of Warren or something to that effect. And, not surprisingly, she makes Warren sound like someone who has unfairly wrested the spotlight from Sherrod Brown. And, another choice of the NYT for a quote about Warren is McConnell, who, like all rightists, pretends the center left of the Democratic Party--formerly the center of the Democratic Party-- is the "far left" of all politics.

Then, look at this Faberge egg from a member of the Bush administration, no less:


Ms. Warren was also one of only four senators who voted against the confirmation of Michael Froman as United States trade representative in 2013, citing what she called his lack of transparency on trade talks.

“She seems to be trying to take scalps and embarrass the administration without knowing what she is talking about,” said Tony Fratto, a former White House and Treasury official in the George W. Bush administration. “No one would ever question Antonio Weiss’s progressive Democratic credentials.”


The only positive comment is from Schumer, also not known for his liberalism.

FYI: all politicians are politicians, just like all other polliticians, but some politicians put advancing the interests of average Americans above advancing the own interests.

Politician:


noun
1.
a person who is active in party politics.
2.
a seeker or holder of public office, who is more concerned about winning favor or retaining power than about maintaining principles.
3.
a person who holds a political office.
4.
a person skilled in political government or administration; statesman or stateswoman.
5.
an expert in politics or political government.
6.
a person who seeks to gain power or advancement within an organization in ways that are generally disapproved.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/politician

The NYT, which has been doing a pretty good job of ignoring Bernie Sanders, seems to have gone from the paper that published the Pentagon Papers to an arm of whichever administration is currently in power *cough* Miller *cough*

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»From Senate Sideline, Eli...»Reply #5