Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. "Pushes her views despite promise of noncandidacy"
Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:50 AM
Dec 2013

I don't think the Third-Wayers and Hillary cheerleaders grasp this as yet - maybe dimly, though, because of that WSJ third way arrogance. The curtain slipped a little on that op-ed - the Third Way wants to deep-six any deviation from its (actually, deeply economically Conservative) intentions.

It is Warren's ideas on key issues that are important, not Warren herself at this point. It is like the TWers assume if they keep saying Warren is not running, we all will settle for Hillary's corporatism. Nope.
In a political culture where smearing a prospective, unwanted by TPTB, candidate is the go-to tactic of choice, they are missing the boat.

Sooner or later, I think sooner, this will bite the Third Way in the ass - "Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time" Harry S Truman.
The enemy here is not Liberals and Progressives, it is the Third Way types. People who vote GOP are not going to vote Dem no matter what Hillary campaigns on, either. So this seems, really, an attempt to wrench what tatters of the liberal wing of the Dem party are remaining to the 1%-pandering right.

Also want to mention, as a woman, that the thought of anyone expecting my vote just because they are a woman makes me nauseous, and makes me wonder if others see the irony and hypocrisy when they read that smug assumption. I want the best PERSON for the job.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author delrem Dec 2013 #1
K & R democrank Dec 2013 #8
"Pushes her views despite promise of noncandidacy" djean111 Dec 2013 #2
Excellent post! Kermitt Gribble Dec 2013 #3
Thanks! And doesn't it seem very weird that we are expected to abandon her views just djean111 Dec 2013 #4
The TW'ers care about winning so they can continue to push their Wall Street agenda. NorthCarolina Dec 2013 #9
Great article dreamnightwind Dec 2013 #16
Great post, and it is encapsulated in tomg Dec 2013 #5
Right. And I think those advocating her views need to really make clear pangaia Dec 2013 #6
I think that's why the phrase "Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party" has come into vogue. winter is coming Dec 2013 #19
Please make this it's own thread. Very good! n/t JimDandy Dec 2013 #13
...expecting my vote just because they are a woman makes me nauseous... Whisp Dec 2013 #17
"First Woman President" is the absolute last thing on my list. winter is coming Dec 2013 #20
Good Morning, Here's my banner. rgbecker Dec 2013 #7
I support BOTH H. Clinton and Warren for spooky3 Dec 2013 #10
Soon the media will be howling about "republican unity vs. the Democratic civil war." NBachers Dec 2013 #11
The party establishment has been forcing their ideas onto liberal democrats. djean111 Dec 2013 #14
The problem with that comparison is that the "Tea Party" is a small minority, bvar22 Dec 2013 #15
K&R ReRe Dec 2013 #12
My heart leaps with hope every time I see or hear her... whathehell Dec 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»Progressive wing waves El...»Reply #2