Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. I don't read it that way. They will be required to make changes right now...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 03:42 PM
Oct 2013

...and further changes may be required following the review process:

The White House has declined to say whether Merkel's phone was monitored in the past. But according to the Wall Street Journal, the Obama administration ordered the NSA to cease the surveillance of her and other leaders after the program emerged over the summer in a separate, internal review of the agency's activities.

Carney said that internal review, led by the White House with input from agencies across government, will also also be completed before the end of the year. It contains what Carney described as a "separate" component dedicated to dealing with issues relating to "some of the very specific things with regard to intelligence gathered, including matters that deal with heads of states and other governments".

The external review, which will feed into the White House's internal assessment of surveillance, has itself been criticised for being too close to the Obama administration.


But these agencies, more than most, are resistant to change and even pressure from the highest office is seen by many of the entrenched to be meddlesome.

It's always been that way.

Bush wouldn't have given any of this the time of day.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Progressive Media Resources Group»NSA review panel to prese...»Reply #6