Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Manny and Steven, sittin' in a tree... [View all]demwing
(16,916 posts)15. This post has received multiple SOP alerts
each explaining to me that SOP says "No disruptive meta."
I find this odd, because when I wrote the SOP, I was very explicit:
"To discuss and debate issues, candidates, and strategies related to the promotion of progressive, populist reforms within the Democratic Party."
Not a word about "No disruptive meta."
Now my ground rules are a little different:
SOME GROUND RULES:
The PRG is a safe house for DUers interested in the progressive, populist reform of our Democratic party.
If you disagree with PRG's message or goal, that's OK. Find a group that fits, or enjoy the DU forums.
Everyone starts out as welcomed. No one earns their way in - only their way out.
Follow all DU rules. Don't put the group at risk
The PRG is a safe house for DUers interested in the progressive, populist reform of our Democratic party.
If you disagree with PRG's message or goal, that's OK. Find a group that fits, or enjoy the DU forums.
Everyone starts out as welcomed. No one earns their way in - only their way out.
Follow all DU rules. Don't put the group at risk
Hmm, still nothing about "No disruptive meta."
I understand this post was cross-posted from GDP, where it WAS locked as having violated the SOP of that forum. A valid lock, IMO.
That's why I was happy to have Manny post his OP here at the PRG. Manny's OP falls under the header of debate of issues, candidates, and strategies related to the promotion of progressive, populist reforms within the Democratic Party.
The post will stand.
I hope Manny posts more frequently in the Progressive Reform Group. As long as he continues to follow the SOP, he'll always be welcome here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes. Third-Way Steve posted a long and entertaining endorsement of Hillary Clinton
MannyGoldstein
Oct 2015
#8
Oh, that's right: Steven's a Fox News contributor, in the honored tradition of Alan Colmes. Not a
cpompilo
Oct 2015
#33
In our world, the government passes a law expressly allowing the government to propagandize
merrily
Oct 2015
#56
Now don't be giving the "alerter squad" so much guff. They have good intentions.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#62
let's not forget that Steven likes to call Sanders fans "Clinton haters". ironic considering the
Doctor_J
Oct 2015
#47
In response to alerts on this thread, as a host of this Group I do not find this thread
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#63