Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Populist Group Post: Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]upaloopa
(11,417 posts)9. When you say "fair game" it describes your
motives exactly. To you it is a game.
So go play your games if you must.
I see you are still are making shit up
Everything you say about Hillary should be discounted and taken with an ocean of salt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Populist Group Post: Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]
merrily
May 2015
OP
Did some one think the Cliintons would not be questioned, criticised, attacked ... from the left ...
JoePhilly
May 2015
#1
? My post doesn't say someone thought the Clintons would not be attacked or anything like that.
merrily
May 2015
#2
Clinton supporters might want to say that he and Chelsea are off limits. I disagree.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#3
AFAIK, Hillary has never associated herself with Chelsea's Wall Street or media jobs
merrily
May 2015
#5
No problems, it's just that sometimes people don't realize where they are when they post.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#12
No, we aren't looking to block people, but we are looking for a safe haven for like-minded people
merrily
May 2015
#33
Children are deemed to have been off limits because they did not seek the spotlight, only a parent
merrily
May 2015
#7
Chelsea is now an adult, hedge funder and overpaid media "journalist", foundation board member.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#14
I meant that my OP did not attempt to make any case about Chelsea. I am not trying to say
merrily
May 2015
#21
Thanks. If the subject comes up, you or anyone who wishes can always link to this thread.
merrily
May 2015
#20
I will not ignore NAFTA, the Telecommunications Act and Gramm, Leach, Bliley.
Enthusiast
May 2015
#17
I've been reading that she may try to disassociate herself from ending "welfare as we know it."
merrily
May 2015
#24
It's not really any different than bringing up W or HW when talking about Jeb Bush
arcane1
May 2015
#26
It isn't just fair to bring Bill AND Hillary into this, it is necessary.
whereisjustice
May 2015
#39
Not even going to read your bs. J. Sanders was never sold as Sanders' co-Senator or any of things
merrily
Dec 2015
#47
Jane Sanders hasn't been in a position yet where she could do really serious damage.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#48
That's what you're always accusing the Clintons of. Clintons, meet Jane Sanders.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#50
Hillary is no populist, but YOU are the one posting in this group, not Hillary,
merrily
Dec 2015
#54
PS When did you complain about the Clinton foundation reporting $10,000,000 as zero?
merrily
Dec 2015
#52