Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
10. You're addressing a host of this group, fair warning.
Wed May 27, 2015, 12:17 PM
May 2015

"Fair game" means that what the family does as related to politics or potential conflicts of interest should be allowable discussion.

Chelsea's connection to big banks is fair game, her cush job at a major news outlet is fair game, and Bill's doings are also fair game.

At least in this group they are.

Did some one think the Cliintons would not be questioned, criticised, attacked ... from the left ... JoePhilly May 2015 #1
? My post doesn't say someone thought the Clintons would not be attacked or anything like that. merrily May 2015 #2
Clinton supporters might want to say that he and Chelsea are off limits. I disagree. NYC_SKP May 2015 #3
I tend to think that Clinton supporters know what's coming. JoePhilly May 2015 #4
AFAIK, Hillary has never associated herself with Chelsea's Wall Street or media jobs merrily May 2015 #5
Good point, however there are parallels. NYC_SKP May 2015 #28
Please see Reply 21. merrily May 2015 #29
When you say "fair game" it describes your upaloopa May 2015 #9
You're addressing a host of this group, fair warning. NYC_SKP May 2015 #10
Warning? I am not afraid! upaloopa May 2015 #11
No problems, it's just that sometimes people don't realize where they are when they post. NYC_SKP May 2015 #12
Well I don't think you should use this platform upaloopa May 2015 #15
! Phlem May 2015 #18
jane enid602 Dec 2015 #57
No, we aren't looking to block people, but we are looking for a safe haven for like-minded people merrily May 2015 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily May 2015 #19
Chelsea was off limits when she was 12. Paka May 2015 #34
We collectively fredamae May 2015 #6
Children are deemed to have been off limits because they did not seek the spotlight, only a parent merrily May 2015 #7
All good points too fredamae May 2015 #8
Chelsea is now an adult, hedge funder and overpaid media "journalist", foundation board member. NYC_SKP May 2015 #14
I meant that my OP did not attempt to make any case about Chelsea. I am not trying to say merrily May 2015 #21
IMO, it is not out of line to mention Bill Clinton. NYC_SKP May 2015 #30
Good Points, Merrily. KoKo May 2015 #13
Thanks. If the subject comes up, you or anyone who wishes can always link to this thread. merrily May 2015 #20
One of things I like about our "Groups" KoKo May 2015 #23
With my blessing. merrily May 2015 #25
I'd say context is everything nxylas May 2015 #16
I will not ignore NAFTA, the Telecommunications Act and Gramm, Leach, Bliley. Enthusiast May 2015 #17
...! KoKo May 2015 #22
I've been reading that she may try to disassociate herself from ending "welfare as we know it." merrily May 2015 #24
It's not really any different than bringing up W or HW when talking about Jeb Bush arcane1 May 2015 #26
I do see it as different. merrily May 2015 #27
Totally misogynistic. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #31
For a woman. merrily May 2015 #32
But that's not what matters now MannyGoldstein May 2015 #35
You'd better sign that one "Third Way Manny" before I merrily May 2015 #36
I'm just a typical Sanders supporter MannyGoldstein May 2015 #37
Then I am drumming you out of this group. merrily May 2015 #38
! MannyGoldstein May 2015 #40
Pffft! Enthusiast May 2015 #41
It isn't just fair to bring Bill AND Hillary into this, it is necessary. whereisjustice May 2015 #39
Good post, thanks merrily. Scuba May 2015 #42
Thank you, Scuba. Glad you found it useful. merrily May 2015 #44
Pinning this thread demwing May 2015 #43
Thanks, demwing merrily May 2015 #45
Great. So Let's talk more about JANE SANDERS. pnwmom Dec 2015 #46
Not even going to read your bs. J. Sanders was never sold as Sanders' co-Senator or any of things merrily Dec 2015 #47
Jane Sanders hasn't been in a position yet where she could do really serious damage. pnwmom Dec 2015 #48
LOL! Speaking of playing fast and loose with the truth..... merrily Dec 2015 #49
That's what you're always accusing the Clintons of. Clintons, meet Jane Sanders. pnwmom Dec 2015 #50
Already responded to on this thread--and this is still a protected group merrily Dec 2015 #51
Hillary and Bill and Bernie are ALL populists. So is Martin, for that matter. pnwmom Dec 2015 #53
Hillary is no populist, but YOU are the one posting in this group, not Hillary, merrily Dec 2015 #54
Where was I "flailing wildly"? pnwmom Dec 2015 #55
LOL! merrily Dec 2015 #56
PS When did you complain about the Clinton foundation reporting $10,000,000 as zero? merrily Dec 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Populist Group Post: Is ...»Reply #10