Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Populist Group Post: Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]arcane1
(38,613 posts)26. It's not really any different than bringing up W or HW when talking about Jeb Bush
Same thing: people running for president who are related to former presidents. Some degree of comparison is inevitable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Populist Group Post: Is it really out of order to mention Bill Clinton? [View all]
merrily
May 2015
OP
Did some one think the Cliintons would not be questioned, criticised, attacked ... from the left ...
JoePhilly
May 2015
#1
? My post doesn't say someone thought the Clintons would not be attacked or anything like that.
merrily
May 2015
#2
Clinton supporters might want to say that he and Chelsea are off limits. I disagree.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#3
AFAIK, Hillary has never associated herself with Chelsea's Wall Street or media jobs
merrily
May 2015
#5
No problems, it's just that sometimes people don't realize where they are when they post.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#12
No, we aren't looking to block people, but we are looking for a safe haven for like-minded people
merrily
May 2015
#33
Children are deemed to have been off limits because they did not seek the spotlight, only a parent
merrily
May 2015
#7
Chelsea is now an adult, hedge funder and overpaid media "journalist", foundation board member.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#14
I meant that my OP did not attempt to make any case about Chelsea. I am not trying to say
merrily
May 2015
#21
Thanks. If the subject comes up, you or anyone who wishes can always link to this thread.
merrily
May 2015
#20
I will not ignore NAFTA, the Telecommunications Act and Gramm, Leach, Bliley.
Enthusiast
May 2015
#17
I've been reading that she may try to disassociate herself from ending "welfare as we know it."
merrily
May 2015
#24
It's not really any different than bringing up W or HW when talking about Jeb Bush
arcane1
May 2015
#26
It isn't just fair to bring Bill AND Hillary into this, it is necessary.
whereisjustice
May 2015
#39
Not even going to read your bs. J. Sanders was never sold as Sanders' co-Senator or any of things
merrily
Dec 2015
#47
Jane Sanders hasn't been in a position yet where she could do really serious damage.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#48
That's what you're always accusing the Clintons of. Clintons, meet Jane Sanders.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#50
Hillary is no populist, but YOU are the one posting in this group, not Hillary,
merrily
Dec 2015
#54
PS When did you complain about the Clinton foundation reporting $10,000,000 as zero?
merrily
Dec 2015
#52