Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cannabis

In reply to the discussion: Driving 'under the influence'... [View all]
 

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)
14. I have posted about this before...
Sat Oct 3, 2015, 08:36 AM
Oct 2015

...but in the 70's and early 80's, a large percentage of professional truck drivers used cannabis on a daily basis. You could pull into any major truck stop across the country and use your CB radio to take part in the market. The rational was that if you were going to spend weeks on the road, truck stop parking lots and grocery warehouses for a small amount of money, you had a right to 'feel good' which was an euphemism for feeling normal. Cannabis worked in that regard.

But you had to be good to avoid suspicion. You had to, first of all, be a seasoned truck driver. That was common in the 70's. And then, you had to be a seasoned pot smoker. That too, was common in the 70's. No accidents allowed. No stupid parking lot collisions and no weaving on the highway. Other truck drivers would call you out immediately. Everybody tried harder which you all know is a direct effect of cannabis.



.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Driving 'under the influence'... [View all] CanSocDem Oct 2015 OP
What every marijuana user knows.. mountain grammy Oct 2015 #1
It also depends greatly on the experience of the driver. WDIM Oct 2015 #2
I got pulled over for a burnt out headlight several years back. I was stoned to the bone! brewens Oct 2015 #3
Uh, no. .08 is blotto Warpy Oct 2015 #12
.08%=.008. That's the legal limit and can be like three beers in an hour. Almost no one brewens Oct 2015 #13
That's more than three units an hour Warpy Oct 2015 #15
Bullshit. So you say the cops will let someone go at .079% which would also be "blotto", brewens Oct 2015 #16
Not if that someone at 0.79% (which reads 0,8 on most of the breathalyzers out there) Warpy Oct 2015 #18
I'm not going to be drawn into a flame war over this. JayhawkSD Oct 2015 #4
totally agree nt tishaLA Oct 2015 #5
My grandson has been telling me this for years. beveeheart Oct 2015 #6
THC impairs cognition, psychomotor function and actual driving performance Jeroen Oct 2015 #7
That's all theoretical and based on concentrated single ingredients. Warpy Oct 2015 #8
I hated driving stoned as well. Jeroen Oct 2015 #11
I've know a couple guys with multiple DUI's that swear they didn't mean to do it. brewens Oct 2015 #17
Reminds me of the Cheech and Chong movie... Canoe52 Oct 2015 #9
driving under the effects of depressants is different than driving under the effects olddots Oct 2015 #10
I have posted about this before... CanSocDem Oct 2015 #14
If tested right now I'd have evidence of drugs in my system and get a dui NightWatcher Oct 2015 #19
Ex-cabdriver, TheJames Oct 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cannabis»Driving 'under the influe...»Reply #14