Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
2. If a black market like this can flourish, then taxes are too high.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 10:06 PM
Mar 2019

I oppose "sin taxes" as a concept, though I understand that they can generate significant revenue in the right circumstances. They work on alcohol reasonably well, since distilling quality alcohol takes quite a bit of know how and equipment. They work on cigarettes and other tobacco products since

But with cannabis, one can grow it pretty well without too much investment. The state is just going to have to accept that weed will not be quite the tax-gusher they'd hoped. A taxation program should support testing for safety (mycotoxins, pesticide residues, etc.) and a bit for schools and roads besides, but it won't pay for everything.

-app

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cannabis»Los Angeles looks to brea...»Reply #2