Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search

Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Should duly convicted and incarcerated* murderers, rapists, and terrorists be allowed to vote? [View all]thesquanderer
(12,523 posts)48. Sirhan Sirhan couldn't vote anyway.
He wasn't a citizen.
But to your actual point here, whether someone when breaking (at least certain) laws forfeits their right to vote... well that may be DemocratSinceBirth's decree, but whether it's true or not depends on what state you live in and what the legislators choose to do. It's not an inherent or constitutional truth.
But I agree that, as you say...
"Prisoners forfeit certain rights when they break the law and are incarcerated . They certainly forfeit their Second and Fourth Amendment rights. It's a matter of drawing lines. "
My question is about drawing those lines. There is clear rationale for taking away an incarcerated person's right to bear arms. What is the rationale for taking away their right to vote? Who is being made safer? How is it contributing to any possible rehabilitation? What greater good is it serving? What benefit does it offer anyone at all, to justify taking away someone's right, other than making people feel good about making a punishment more severe? Is that enough?
And drawing lines about not just which rights you take away, but also who you take them away from, is likewise not so simple. If, as you imply, you only want to take them away for the very worst offenders, there are even gradations among rapists, murderers, and terrorists. That's one reason why even these crimes can have wildly varying incarceration periods. It's possible for someone who committed a "lesser" crime to be in prison for longer than a particular person who committed one of these "worse" crimes. But that's a secondary point. Mostly, I'm looking for the rationale for taking away the right at all.

primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Should duly convicted and incarcerated* murderers, rapists, and terrorists be allowed to vote? [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
OP
Then let inmates who aren't rapists, murderers, and terrorists vote.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#28
I never called taking away the right to vote cruel and unusual punishment.
thesquanderer
Apr 2019
#64
A lot of things I consider cruel and unusual punishment or privations my fellow Americans don't
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#68
No it doesn't - it spells out that Jim Crow culture is still a real thing...
Dennis Donovan
Apr 2019
#10
Jim Crow laws were based on an immutable characteristic which is race.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#12
It doesn't. And it shows how limited his understanding truly is....I mean Vermont is a very
Demsrule86
Apr 2019
#61
It's up to the states. Two states allow incarcerated prisoners to vote, Maine and Vermont
Rhiannon12866
Apr 2019
#46
People who have cannabis for their own consumption shouldn't be in the hoosegow
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#9
For me, the question is moot because the vote tallies would be fraudulent in most cases.
ecstatic
Apr 2019
#13
In order for it to work, third party observers would need to oversee the voting and it would
Uncle Joe
Apr 2019
#14
Probably. So lets fix the outside voting first before giving republicans millions
ecstatic
Apr 2019
#20
I'll bet that Bernie in retrospect wishes he had answered it in somewhat that way.
mtnsnake
Apr 2019
#23
Vermont also ships prisoners, some of them African American, to the Deep South
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#32
Non sequitur. I never said Vermont was perfect. Whataboutism doesn't fly. (n/t)
thesquanderer
Apr 2019
#49
You did suggest Vermont was an exemplar or model for the nation, if not the entire world.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#54
Why do they forfeit their 2nd and 4th Amendment rights while incarcerated?
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#33
Let's not be too quick to bestow upon Vermont the honor of being an exemplar to the world
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#56
Prisoners suffer infinitely worse privations and horrors than losing the right to vote.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2019
#39
It's similar to the percentage of people who supported the Freedom Rides at the time.
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 2019
#53
Truth is, I'm not sure this is important enough to get upset about...
TreasonousBastard
Apr 2019
#58