Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BOSSHOG

(40,368 posts)
3. A question for lawyers and those who play one on the internet
Sat Oct 5, 2024, 08:04 PM
Oct 5

What is the “standing” that Republican jerks and religious zealots have relative to keeping a woman from getting an abortion regardless of the reason? Does not one have to prove harm or loss to self, in other words “standing” when pursuing legislation to prevent something? The aforementioned groups are neither harmed nor suffer loss when a woman or 12 year old homeless rape victim gets an abortion.

Using left handed logic which I’m good at. Because I’m left handed. Could us liberals take legislation to the Supreme Court totally banning Republican jerks and religious zealots accompanied by millions of witnesses ready to prove harm and loss. All witnesses ready to testify right now? As Bell would say, it’s just a thought.





Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Jessica Valenti: 'The end...»Reply #3