Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pototan

(2,264 posts)
3. Just for context
Sat Nov 16, 2024, 11:44 PM
Nov 16

The Philippines has just one six-year term for President. Duterte transferred his power peacefully. The Supreme Court has an independent commission that produces three names to fill a vacancy. The President chooses one of those three names. There is no confirmation. As a result, the Supreme Court acts more independently here than in the US.

The one flaw that I've found in the Philippine Constitution is that, even though they choose their President by popular vote, its winner take all- in a one-time election. In other words, a person can win in a crowded field with 35% or 40%, which was the case with Duterte. There is no runoff. this leaves the country vulnerable to a radical minority candidate winning a 6-year term.

Marcos Jr. won more than 55% of the vote.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»'Hold the line': Nobel la...»Reply #3