Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(1,339 posts)
14. Agreed! I was originally impressed with Medias Touch. It seemed that they found the sweet-spot and...
Mon Oct 27, 2025, 09:07 AM
Oct 2025

that they had captured lighting in a jar. I enjoyed their analysis and reporting. They seemed serious and on the right track, UNTIL... they hit 1-million subscribers, things changed. Then 2-million and things changed again (for the worse).

The reporting and analysis changed. The content was shoddy. The headlines and thumbnails were pure clickbait. Bold IMPACT font, yellow arrows and red circles ("look here, yes here, what's this?... click now and we'll tell you... maybe.'')

It became clear to me that their priority was more-more-MORE subscribers and clicks. Their videos started to become repetitive (throughout the day... but within the SAME video!!) He would read or talk about the details and in 5 minutes, we had the gist of it. Then for the next 10-15 minutes he would just find different ways to repeat what he'd already told us.

I presume that this is for financial gain through mid-roll ads. Videos over eight minutes long are eligible for mid-roll ads, which YouTube can place at multiple points throughout the content. This gives creators an opportunity to earn significantly more ad revenue from a single video compared to a shorter one, where ads can only appear at the beginning or end.

Also, "watch time" (the total minutes viewers spend watching a channel's videos) is a key metric for the YouTube algorithm. Videos with longer watch time are favored and promoted more often in search results and recommendations. Apparently, by stretching content, creators can drive up this metric, even if it leads to lower viewer engagement toward the end of the video.

This, in combination with their flirting with Betteridge's Law of Headlines (as Thom Hartmann does) makes their channels tedious and worthless to me.

I know it's competitive and that eyes, views, clicks, subscribers, memberships, patreon and interaction mean the world to these creators... but somewhere along the journey, they lost their way.

It ends up being a vicious cycle. They lose viewers and supporters by turning them off with these manipulative tactics... which causes them to need to engage in manipulative tactics even more. I've unsubscribed and "blocked" them in my personal youtube account/login... but they still show up here... wasting space, but not getting any clicks from me.

Sad.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bologna Srkdqltr Oct 2025 #1
You're the bologna NJCher Oct 2025 #2
I don't waste my time watching these . . . AverageOldGuy Oct 2025 #9
That's your business NJCher Oct 2025 #16
He makes a compelling case NJCher Oct 2025 #3
If only it were true. I've been seeing these clickbait headlines (and RED ARROWS)... QueerDuck Oct 2025 #4
Click baits for sure calguy Oct 2025 #5
Agreed! I was originally impressed with Medias Touch. It seemed that they found the sweet-spot and... QueerDuck Oct 2025 #14
You said it ALL, QueerDuck! some_of_us_are_sane Oct 2025 #18
johnston is wrong rampartd Oct 2025 #6
Being from Missouri MissouriDem47 Oct 2025 #7
You and I both. MLWR Oct 2025 #10
Oh, please . . . AverageOldGuy Oct 2025 #8
Too bad DU feels the necessity ... Escape Oct 2025 #11
I had not thought of that before... but you know, YOU'RE RIGHT! QueerDuck Oct 2025 #15
Yeah John Coktosten Oct 2025 #12
Blah.... berksdem Oct 2025 #13
So Pam Bondi and Kash Patel have SEEN THESE PICTURES! MagaSmash Oct 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Trump To Be Forced Out? T...»Reply #14