Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cadoman

(1,060 posts)
8. when they get the jitters and shortcut the democratic process
Wed Jan 29, 2025, 12:33 AM
Jan 29

They were afraid of weakening Biden so rather than run a neutral primary they suppressed it into non-existence.

I understand their thinking. Hindsight is 20-20. But would the party and country have been better served if Biden had his debate short-circuit against a primary challenger rather than Trump? The administration and party could have shifted gears immediately--maybe even creating a midterm succession to Harris which might encourage the other candidates to step down. Harris gets to step in and show her chops to the voters as well as firmly establish her platform outside Biden's shadow.

It's just a thought exercise, but as far as how it applies to the way forward: trust Democracy. The primary process is scary because it exposes our candidates, but in the long run it makes our candidates stronger because it gives frustrated voices a chance to be heard and allows us to see and fix weaknesses before they're exposed in the general election.

New way forward: stop short-cutting the primary process & trust Democracy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»I know this is raking ove...»Reply #8