Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Prairie Gates

(2,133 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2024, 06:08 PM Jun 28

New York Times Editorial Board Calls for Biden to Step Aside [View all]

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/biden-election-debate-trump.html



As it stands, the president is engaged in a reckless gamble. There are Democratic leaders better equipped to present clear, compelling and energetic alternatives to a second Trump presidency. There is no reason for the party to risk the stability and security of the country by forcing voters to choose between Mr. Trump’s deficiencies and those of Mr. Biden. It’s too big a bet to simply hope Americans will overlook or discount Mr. Biden’s age and infirmity that they see with their own eyes.


Never seen that before.
112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yeah, didn't see that coming. Think. Again. Jun 28 #1
So they support the one person that all of NYC despises. F U NYT. CurtEastPoint Jun 28 #2
Doesn't seem so Prairie Gates Jun 28 #4
President Trump got 691,682 votes in NYC in 2020, 22.7% of the votes cast. So 'all of NYC' despising kelly1mm Jun 29 #92
Oh fawk them. a kennedy Jun 28 #3
So predictable. lol tman Jun 28 #5
Seriously? It's kind of historical, no? Prairie Gates Jun 28 #9
Yeah, but somehow very predictable of them. tman Jun 28 #13
That's a good point PatSeg Jun 28 #25
no not a good point. NoRethugFriends Jun 28 #54
No, I disagree PatSeg Jun 28 #60
I definitely agree that a replacement at this point would be dumb NoRethugFriends Jun 28 #73
It's risky at this point, you are right. I'd go beyond "dumb" and say "incredibly risky." CTyankee Jun 29 #107
Yes, that should be interesting PatSeg Jun 29 #108
Good point about them not asking former President and convicted felon Trump to step aside. However, I'm afraid that artemisia1 Jun 29 #97
No, it's not legitimate, actually. choie Jun 29 #105
I agree PatSeg Jun 29 #110
Unfortunately, it is too late in the game PatSeg Jun 29 #109
No it is not "historical" - it is Arthur (the NYTimes publisher) continuing to throw a temper tantrum TBF Jun 28 #20
I dunno Prairie Gates Jun 28 #23
Really? Arthur carries on this vendetta against Joe Biden and you think that TBF Jun 28 #28
Trump's a despicable piece of shit who shouldn't be anywhere near the Presidency Prairie Gates Jun 28 #33
You'll be surprised to hear that I'm still a subscriber - TBF Jun 28 #65
Yes, of course Prairie Gates Jun 28 #66
I just disagree with your opinion - TBF Jun 28 #67
Huh? Which opinion of mine do you disagree with? Prairie Gates Jun 28 #85
Not nearly as much as it used to. Biophilic Jun 28 #30
Not really. orange jar Jun 28 #36
I don't think people decided their votes based on editorials in the 20th century either Prairie Gates Jun 28 #39
I didn't necessarily mean that people decided their votes based on editorials, orange jar Jun 28 #45
I don't think they'll decide based on NY Times or allies Prairie Gates Jun 28 #46
New York times carries no weight at all these days. NoRethugFriends Jun 28 #74
I mean, OK Prairie Gates Jun 28 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author orange jar Jun 28 #21
Just another day at the NYT. Raven123 Jun 28 #6
Of course XanaDUer2 Jun 28 #7
But not the convicted felon malaise Jun 28 #8
The same editorial says they'd still easily pick Biden over Trump if those are the choices... Silent3 Jun 28 #58
Facts no longer matter. Silent Type Jun 28 #61
Thanks malaise Jun 28 #71
Funny how Dump used to bash them so much Blue Owl Jun 28 #10
When are they going to call for the convicted felon to step aside? mcar Jun 28 #11
GOOD QUESTION!& Cha Jun 28 #50
Presumably they think it makes Trump a shittier candidate Sgent Jun 29 #95
never called for the 34 count felony indicted former president to step aside bigtree Jun 28 #12
They should all be fitted with multiple sex devices in their rectum. LiberalFighter Jun 28 #14
You say that like it's a bad thing JoseBalow Jun 29 #99
Coordinated MEdia effort to remove Joe talked about last night deminks Jun 28 #15
Great post. Frank D. Lincoln Jun 28 #47
Surely these assholes called for twice impeached guy to step down? Eliot Rosewater Jun 28 #16
They supported his impeachments SouthBayDem Jun 28 #76
Thank you for pointing that out! And they also published a record long article of his years of tax invasion Rhiannon12866 Jun 29 #111
Pretty sure they did, or at least supported removing him nt Azathoth Jun 28 #88
As many above have noted, cheato was never asked to drop out senseandsensibility Jun 28 #17
Eat Shit, NYT Assholes. DinahMoeHum Jun 28 #18
Here we go orange jar Jun 28 #19
Trump was convicted of 34 felonies, found liable for rape, etc Sanity Claws Jun 28 #22
The major news media loves to tell Democrats what they should do BootinUp Jun 28 #24
In other words FelineOverlord Jun 28 #26
Who is surprised by this? LetMyPeopleVote Jun 28 #27
WAY too early for that NYT. One bad performance doesnt equal capitulation. oldsoftie Jun 28 #29
Might have to cancel my subscription, finally. Ocelot II Jun 28 #31
A bad night counts but being a convicted felon awaiting sentencing and at least three more trials don't? ... marble falls Jun 28 #32
No magical person is coming to convince people to vote for them FloridaBlues Jun 28 #34
do you have a link to their article saying the person convicted of 34 felonies should drop out? Takket Jun 28 #35
No, I posted the editorial from earlier today Prairie Gates Jun 28 #41
Fuck them. swimboy Jun 28 #37
They should ask Trump to step down flamingdem Jun 28 #38
You might want to actually read the editorial, if you think they are "all in with Cheato." Ms. Toad Jun 29 #93
The gang that helped TSF moondust Jun 28 #40
Go stick it up your ass NYTIMES. triron Jun 28 #42
NYT: you are eminently ignorable. ananda Jun 28 #43
lol. As If the NYT had a say in the Cha Jun 28 #44
All because Biden wouldn't giive them access valleyrogue Jun 28 #48
So glad I canceled my subscription pinkstarburst Jun 28 #49
Does Putin have an interest in the NYT? lpbk2713 Jun 28 #51
The NYT has become a joke. They push 45's drivel for him AllyCat Jun 28 #52
Liberal media my ass.🤬nt Phoenix61 Jun 28 #53
To paraphrase a famous child .... Mossfern Jun 28 #55
Just curious, but have they EVER asked the same of Trump? Hekate Jun 28 #56
Fuck them Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 28 #57
👆🏾🖕that rag. Duncanpup Jun 28 #59
I can just hear Trump now, "The NY TImes wants Biden to step down!" LeftInTX Jun 28 #62
F the NYT kimbutgar Jun 28 #63
Go fuck yourself with a rusty chainsaw NYTs MustLoveBeagles Jun 28 #64
Fetterman reacts ARandomPerson Jun 28 #68
What he said oasis Jun 28 #69
Doesn't cost them anything to try and push out the best candidate to beat Trump. Baitball Blogger Jun 28 #70
Looks like someone's real eager for Democrats to give up that incumbency advantage 0rganism Jun 28 #72
No. Bluethroughu Jun 28 #77
They can go fuck themselves. I'm canceling my subscription. BigDemVoter Jun 28 #78
The NY Times editorial board hated it when Biden beat Trump in 2020. texasfiddler Jun 28 #79
Fuck them Dem4life1234 Jun 28 #80
A sane country would also be telling Biden to step down Azathoth Jun 28 #86
I've been calling for the New York Times Editorial Board to step aside for ages! johnp3907 Jun 28 #81
Fuck them. Iris Jun 28 #82
I hate to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory... brooklynite Jun 28 #83
Are you responding to the OP or just carrying on in your usual manner? Prairie Gates Jun 28 #84
Plenty of assertions in the thread... brooklynite Jun 28 #87
Ooooh...you're responding to the whole thread... Prairie Gates Jun 28 #90
"Our corporate media masters must not be questioned" 😉 SocialDemocrat61 Jun 29 #103
Nope, they're in it to win it.. for trump. mountain grammy Jun 29 #112
Dear NYT orangecrush Jun 28 #89
NYT is a rag duckworth969 Jun 29 #91
FTNYT Catherine Vincent Jun 29 #94
but a Putin Puppet, seditionist, convicted felon, sex offender, con man is A-OK Skittles Jun 29 #96
Malarkey spanone Jun 29 #98
Fuck off. SamKnause Jun 29 #100
Screw the Times BoRaGard Jun 29 #101
Fuck those idiots... but at least I got paper to line the bottom of my bird cage!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 29 #102
New York Times Editorial Board can go pound sand. DId they ever say anything comparable about the Insurrection? raccoon Jun 29 #104
I saw this early this a.m. since I subscribe to the NYT. Alas, I felt I could not navigate the Latest Breaking News CTyankee Jun 29 #106
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times Editorial ...