Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The public will see potentially incriminating evidence about the GOP candidate for President shortly before the election [View all]
What a Difference a Judge MakesJack Smith has a good day in DC Federal Court
In a Joint Status Report in the DC election interference case, Special Counsel Jack Smith told Judge Tanya Chutkan that his opening brief would mention secret grand jury evidence that was not disclosed in the latest indictment of former President Trump. Thats an important development, as this means that the public will see potentially incriminating evidence about the GOP candidate for President shortly before the election.
In addition, Judge Chutkan ruled that the issue of Presidential immunity will be fully briefed on Jack Smiths timetable which is before the election. And in three weeks, Smith is going to preview his case in his written pleadings, including the new evidence against Trump. Thats why yesterdays hearing before Judge Chutkan was a win for Jack Smith, which had to be a breath of fresh air considering the constant beating that he and his fellow prosecutors have taken in Judge Aileen Cannons courtroom who was considered pro-prosecution before the defendant was named Donald Trump.
MORE:
https://meidasnews.com/news/what-a-difference-a-judge-makes
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.233.0_2.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
56 replies, 9760 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (218)
ReplyReply to this post
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The public will see potentially incriminating evidence about the GOP candidate for President shortly before the election [View all]
kpete
Sep 6
OP
I hope he knows what he's doing. I've given up waiting for Fitzmas, don't want to be sad about Smith-o-ween.
mucholderthandirt
Sep 7
#56
Rest assured Kamala Harris KNOWS of this and will use it against tRump when the moment is right.
ProudMNDemocrat
Sep 6
#8
The sign doesn't look like it's in FL, though, since there's no land that high here.
ancianita
Sep 6
#32
Anyone undecided in a race involving Trump deserves every ounce of disrespect that's hurled at them.
Iggo
Sep 6
#17
It's still important to spread what we know far and wide, especially online. One never knows how many votes
ancianita
Sep 6
#33
It's not legal. The DOJ is in one branch, justices are in another. No DOJ has jurisdiction over any part of SCOTUS.
ancianita
Sep 6
#35
He is. But here's who's been telling us all along what entity (working around a corrupt congressional party) CAN
ancianita
Sep 6
#37
Whitehouse has clearly SAID that the only laws under which justices can be accountable outside a
ancianita
Sep 6
#40
If that evidence is classify, I guess the President can declassify it. 8)
Justice matters.
Sep 6
#21