Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krawhitham

(4,899 posts)
14. It would be a very bad idea
Wed Sep 25, 2024, 12:55 PM
Sep 25

Make a carve-out for two votes, Voting rights & Women's health (just like SCOTUS votes are carved out now). After that force them to do old school filibusters, they will break 99% of the time, only issues I see them not breaking on is Voting rights, Women's health, & border security


Just imagine the damage trump would have done in his first 2 years if he did not have a filibuster to deal with. The ACA would be gone, so would NATO, and we would currently have a National abortion bad


Getting rid of the fillibuster would allow one party who has just one good election cycle to completely reshape America, that is not a good thing. The GOP just had a good election cycle in 2016. If they have another they will fully enact Project 2025. if they don't have a fillibuster

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Democrats win the Pres...»Reply #14