Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]displacedvermoter
(4,061 posts)8. I would have to say that is pretty silly as
You have no idea how many Republican for Harris folks will actually deliver votes, while all the folks here on DU who you seem to be talking about are active Democrats who have been Democrats all along, and not just jumping on board after decades spent bringing us this close to disaster.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Phrases come to mind: "Cut off nose to spite your face", "Perfect is enemy of the good", . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2024
#1
I would argue it is even worse, those that feel the need to do that are actually working against the Democrats.
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#3
Like we were in 2016 by Cornell West, David Sirota, Brian Joy Gray, Nina Turner, etc. etc. etc.
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#22
and you don't know how many will vote for Harris/Walz because of those endorsements. It is called the Howard Dean
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#21
I don't know, but Sen. Sanders did endorse Hillary in 2016, and the Democratic nominees henceforth, but some of his
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#43
Personally ANYONE who said anything REMOTELY like "I will have to hold my nose to vote for Hillary"
Eliot Rosewater
Oct 2024
#52
With that logic I should be rallying against those who voted for Jill Stein in 2016 also, instead of following the
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#23
Not railing against them at all. I don't talk about the Cheneys until a Cheney love fest gets started.
Iggo
Oct 2024
#6
YES we FIRST put the MASSIVE FIRE OUT then worry about the attitudes of some of the firefighters
Eliot Rosewater
Oct 2024
#54
and I could argue that Cornell West, David Sirota, Nina Turner, Brianna Joy Gray, etc. who actively campaigned against
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#24
Exactly Cha. With that logic, should I start condemning those who voted for Jill Stein in 2016, and helped give us the
JohnSJ
Oct 2024
#25
DUH DUH DUH ...no, I know, lets require PERFECTION now NOT JUST FROM OUR CANDIDATES but ALSO from our VOTERS
Eliot Rosewater
Oct 2024
#55
Since 2016 my policy is simple: if you just support democracy, I don't need to quarrel with you.
paulkienitz
Oct 2024
#27
I will debate reasons we need to be careful on this board and with hardcore liberal friends, BUT
Cheezoholic
Oct 2024
#28
Like I said I agree with the premis that publically attacking the Cheney's support is a really bad idea
Cheezoholic
Oct 2024
#37
Yep, I actually dont think we need the Cheney's endorsement to win but there is too much to lose
Cheezoholic
Oct 2024
#39
Some are STILL convinced the majority of Americans are secretly socialists or Leftist populists or whatever and
betsuni
Oct 2024
#42
It's an article of faith around here that a Republican can never be right about anything
Shrek
Oct 2024
#46
No SHIT...if trmp takes over there IS NO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or Democratic Party or
Eliot Rosewater
Oct 2024
#56