Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peggysue2

(11,510 posts)
49. We're looking to save the country from utter madness
Sun Oct 6, 2024, 11:16 AM
Oct 6

So yes, anyone willing to go shoulder-to-shoulder in that effort is an ally in this moment despite political affiliations and/or past political stands and utterances.

We must WIN first.

Then we can get back to cat-brawling on issues and policy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Phrases come to mind: "Cut off nose to spite your face", "Perfect is enemy of the good", . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 5 #1
Yeah, a lot of us aren't as smart as others displacedvermoter Oct 5 #2
I would argue it is even worse, those that feel the need to do that are actually working against the Democrats. JohnSJ Oct 5 #3
I would have to say that is pretty silly as displacedvermoter Oct 5 #8
people are so easily fooled Skittles Oct 5 #15
Like we were in 2016 by Cornell West, David Sirota, Brian Joy Gray, Nina Turner, etc. etc. etc. JohnSJ Oct 5 #22
WHATEVER Skittles Oct 5 #36
Yes, but H2O Man Oct 6 #51
and you don't know how many will vote for Harris/Walz because of those endorsements. It is called the Howard Dean JohnSJ Oct 5 #21
So why is a contingent here always so happy displacedvermoter Oct 5 #26
I don't know, but Sen. Sanders did endorse Hillary in 2016, and the Democratic nominees henceforth, but some of his JohnSJ Oct 6 #43
Those people named did support Sanders and they did not support Democrats JI7 Oct 6 #44
+1 betsuni Oct 6 #45
In any primary, some of the losers voters ultimately go for the other party karynnj Oct 6 #50
Personally ANYONE who said anything REMOTELY like "I will have to hold my nose to vote for Hillary" Eliot Rosewater Oct 6 #52
Pretty strident displacedvermoter Oct 6 #57
BULLSHIT Eliot Rosewater Oct 6 #58
Yes displacedvermoter Oct 6 #60
Amazing, isn't it? smh Hekate Oct 5 #4
Haters gonna hate. nt LexVegas Oct 5 #5
With that logic I should be rallying against those who voted for Jill Stein in 2016 also, instead of following the JohnSJ Oct 5 #23
Not railing against them at all. I don't talk about the Cheneys until a Cheney love fest gets started. Iggo Oct 5 #6
I saw a 'face-eating leopard' defending the face of our party yesterday. bigtree Oct 5 #12
"The enemy of my enemy is my.... electoral ally, for the moment" Jack Valentino Oct 5 #7
With you 100%, well said KS Toronado Oct 5 #30
YES we FIRST put the MASSIVE FIRE OUT then worry about the attitudes of some of the firefighters Eliot Rosewater Oct 6 #54
not railing AGAINST them Skittles Oct 5 #9
They're just hedging their bets if he loses, orthoclad Oct 5 #20
yup Skittles Oct 5 #34
and I could argue that Cornell West, David Sirota, Nina Turner, Brianna Joy Gray, etc. who actively campaigned against JohnSJ Oct 5 #24
not sure what that has to do with this but Skittles Oct 5 #35
Some of us can walk and chew gum and the same time Fiendish Thingy Oct 5 #10
THANK YOU Skittles Oct 5 #14
And see, you and me agreeing that pissing on displacedvermoter Oct 5 #18
I don't have to like them or ever vote for BlueKota Oct 5 #11
Agree 1000 percent LearnedHand Oct 5 #13
lol Hey.. I wanted to get on that thread and say.. Cha Oct 5 #16
Exactly Cha. With that logic, should I start condemning those who voted for Jill Stein in 2016, and helped give us the JohnSJ Oct 5 #25
DUH DUH DUH ...no, I know, lets require PERFECTION now NOT JUST FROM OUR CANDIDATES but ALSO from our VOTERS Eliot Rosewater Oct 6 #55
Agree. betsuni Oct 5 #17
This is not "politics". This is survival. orthoclad Oct 5 #19
Since 2016 my policy is simple: if you just support democracy, I don't need to quarrel with you. paulkienitz Oct 5 #27
I will debate reasons we need to be careful on this board and with hardcore liberal friends, BUT Cheezoholic Oct 5 #28
I don't see anyone here as naive like that bigtree Oct 5 #31
Like I said I agree with the premis that publically attacking the Cheney's support is a really bad idea Cheezoholic Oct 5 #37
sure, attack them viciously... AFTER THE THREAT IS OVER. paulkienitz Oct 11 #61
+1 betsuni Oct 6 #40
Thank you, our new coalition concerns me on another level displacedvermoter Oct 6 #38
Yep, I actually dont think we need the Cheney's endorsement to win but there is too much to lose Cheezoholic Oct 6 #39
Yup. Let's remember who the foe is, folks. Joinfortmill Oct 5 #29
Totally agree. Didn't Biden try to work with the other side? LiberalFighter Oct 5 #32
I welcome ammunition from all quarters. dalton99a Oct 5 #33
Right, just look at how close many of our elections have been JI7 Oct 6 #41
Some are STILL convinced the majority of Americans are secretly socialists or Leftist populists or whatever and betsuni Oct 6 #42
It's an article of faith around here that a Republican can never be right about anything Shrek Oct 6 #46
For my part DemonGoddess Oct 6 #47
Damn , this whole thread and NOT ONCE dweller Oct 6 #48
We're looking to save the country from utter madness peggysue2 Oct 6 #49
No SHIT...if trmp takes over there IS NO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or Democratic Party or Eliot Rosewater Oct 6 #56
What you wrote should be obvious, Eliot peggysue2 Oct 6 #59
Well, whatever. mucholderthandirt Oct 6 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #49