Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nixie

(17,418 posts)
22. She did do so well. She was very relatable, accountable, intelligent.
Tue Oct 15, 2024, 06:20 PM
Oct 15

She gave herself a huge advantage by going to that venue and engage those voters or potential voters.

I found Charlemagne to be a very engaging host. Not that I listen to him much to compare, but he seemed fair. It was interesting to listen to all the way around.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Listeners are asking some tough questions, and she's responding well. Silent Type Oct 15 #1
Absolutely. Comparing this to the crap trump was doing at the Chicago Economic Conference interview by Bloomberg is JohnSJ Oct 15 #3
"Identity politics" is pretty much what all the bigotry-baiting is all about unblock Oct 15 #2
and she wasn't baited by it either. She is so comfortable and competent, I really wish some of these undecided voters, JohnSJ Oct 15 #4
My view of those interviewed LiberalFighter Oct 15 #7
Maybe, but those questions were NOT softball questions, and they voiced real concerns. JohnSJ Oct 15 #8
It's also in the unfortunate framing of the discussion BaronChocula Oct 15 #25
So who is the person who called in about identity politics? duncang Oct 15 #5
It was a caller. The screener of the calls let it through. JohnSJ Oct 15 #6
Yeah, but I wouldn't doubt it was someone from his campaign. duncang Oct 15 #9
Regardless, in my view she was excellent. JohnSJ Oct 15 #10
TSF's "identity politics" is Fascist Morons. Cha Oct 15 #13
Of course she is & FO to the Pundits & Pollsters. Cha Oct 15 #11
Who has claimed Trump would get 95% of the Black vote? onenote Oct 15 #12
I think that was an oddly worded sentence whopis01 Oct 15 #15
Thanks, I screwed up, I meant 15% not 95%, and I don't believe that number either, but yes I do fell she will get JohnSJ Oct 15 #18
You are right, that was an error on my part. I meant 15%, and have self-corrected. JohnSJ Oct 15 #17
Listened to part of it on CNN Deminpenn Oct 15 #14
Charlemagne is an Ass Wiz Imp Oct 15 #16
She did do well. I listened on iHeart radio, and Charlemagne was not being an ass on this interview. In fact he was JohnSJ Oct 15 #19
He said a couple things Deminpenn Oct 15 #20
I don't know what CT stands for BUT BaronChocula Oct 15 #27
CT Conspiracy theory Deminpenn Oct 16 #35
He can be fine at times and then others he's a gigantic asshole. Overall I've never been impressed Wiz Imp Oct 15 #21
She did do so well. She was very relatable, accountable, intelligent. Nixie Oct 15 #22
I haven't been a big fan of his... appmanga Oct 15 #24
Just finished the replay here. Gods, she is brilliant. The only one who matches her is Buttegieg... Hekate Oct 15 #23
Amazingly smart,but rarely smart ass BattleRow Oct 15 #26
Did she ask CTG ... krkaufman Oct 15 #28
"...the pollsters and some pundits..." are employed by the Trump campaign. dchill Oct 15 #29
This is why I don't believe in polls. Dump has paid for..... Butterflylady Oct 15 #32
I read elsewhere that there were about 40 polls paid for ... dchill Oct 15 #34
JohnSJ, You're saying almost EXACTLY what I said in response to another post about how black men will refuse to vote The_REAL_Ecumenist Oct 15 #30
Without a doubt, and it will be African Americans that will win the election for Democrats in those critical states. JohnSJ Oct 15 #31
I agree. It's all bullshit.There are black pollsters who frequent Roland Martin that do not see what these pollsters say tulipsandroses Oct 15 #33
As a bonus RJ_MacReady Oct 16 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Listening to VP Harris on...»Reply #22