Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jack E Smith! - not Jack L Smith [View all]NJCher
(38,819 posts)5. I'm not terrified
Those are just the facts. Somebody has to define the problem succinctly before we can do anything about it. That's what Jack has done.
I liked the part about the mentally spent candidate and how he was chosen because he is desperate. Also how they even chose his successor in case he becomes too hard to handle.They are already at that point and he's not even at his inauguration.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Wow wonderful poster. Thanks and I agree with malaise's suggestion to post as its own OP.
c-rational
Nov 2024
#88
Yes and so many Americans will respond to this message when our side takes this on in full force.
Passages
Nov 2024
#120
I care. There is clearly a different weight and implication based on source credibility.
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#37
I would think that Jack Smith would carry more weight than rando-person on internet. nt
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#84
The literal title of the thread is "Jack E Smith!" When it is presented as "Jack E Smith!" I expect "Jack E Smith!"
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#108
The fact that it is Jack "E." Smith should have been the giveaway, since Special
niyad
Nov 2024
#110
And the coppery, and aluminumy. Please harass someone else over unimportant bullshit. I'm busy. nt
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#127
I imagine the real Jack Smith cares about his name and photo being associated with words he didn't write.
onenote
Nov 2024
#43
It is interesting that you thought that the OP needed to be informed of that fact.
niyad
Nov 2024
#81
It's the last chance for the world's elite to steal everything of value before climate chaos really hits.
CrispyQ
Nov 2024
#13
This may be the most important thing that you read today, especially so, considering the source.
EarnestPutz
Nov 2024
#31
The problem with your post is that Biden is smart as are the people advising him
onenote
Nov 2024
#41
So, these tariffs that Shitler keeps talking about, exactly where would all of the $$ be going?
OMGWTF
Nov 2024
#61
Nazi Germany had its oligarchs too even if they were called industrialists
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2024
#62
I totally agree with Jack, but I would suggest that's it's not just American,
Uncle Joe
Nov 2024
#97
malaise, I believe you should make it clear in your OP that this is a fake account you are linking us to. nt
DontBelieveEastisEas
Nov 2024
#107
I've known this for decades. I've been watching how our oligarchs have manipulated the economy to benefir themselves.
SharonAnn
Nov 2024
#122
The name difference does not discount or discredit the value of the message conveyed.
magicarpet
Nov 2024
#137