Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jack E Smith! - not Jack L Smith [View all]Gore1FL
(22,166 posts)108. The literal title of the thread is "Jack E Smith!" When it is presented as "Jack E Smith!" I expect "Jack E Smith!"
So yes. In the context of how the infomration was presented, "Jack E Smith!" is sort of an expected requirement.
And yes, those words would have had more meaning if they had been from "Jack E Smith!"
I'm glad you got it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Wow wonderful poster. Thanks and I agree with malaise's suggestion to post as its own OP.
c-rational
Nov 2024
#88
Yes and so many Americans will respond to this message when our side takes this on in full force.
Passages
Nov 2024
#120
I care. There is clearly a different weight and implication based on source credibility.
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#37
I would think that Jack Smith would carry more weight than rando-person on internet. nt
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#84
The literal title of the thread is "Jack E Smith!" When it is presented as "Jack E Smith!" I expect "Jack E Smith!"
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#108
The fact that it is Jack "E." Smith should have been the giveaway, since Special
niyad
Nov 2024
#110
And the coppery, and aluminumy. Please harass someone else over unimportant bullshit. I'm busy. nt
Gore1FL
Nov 2024
#127
I imagine the real Jack Smith cares about his name and photo being associated with words he didn't write.
onenote
Nov 2024
#43
It is interesting that you thought that the OP needed to be informed of that fact.
niyad
Nov 2024
#81
It's the last chance for the world's elite to steal everything of value before climate chaos really hits.
CrispyQ
Nov 2024
#13
This may be the most important thing that you read today, especially so, considering the source.
EarnestPutz
Nov 2024
#31
The problem with your post is that Biden is smart as are the people advising him
onenote
Nov 2024
#41
So, these tariffs that Shitler keeps talking about, exactly where would all of the $$ be going?
OMGWTF
Nov 2024
#61
Nazi Germany had its oligarchs too even if they were called industrialists
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2024
#62
I totally agree with Jack, but I would suggest that's it's not just American,
Uncle Joe
Nov 2024
#97
malaise, I believe you should make it clear in your OP that this is a fake account you are linking us to. nt
DontBelieveEastisEas
Nov 2024
#107
I've known this for decades. I've been watching how our oligarchs have manipulated the economy to benefir themselves.
SharonAnn
Nov 2024
#122
The name difference does not discount or discredit the value of the message conveyed.
magicarpet
Nov 2024
#137