Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Ilikepurple
(422 posts)106. Yes, the BBC thing confused me. I think it was to find the stats?
The poster has been around or a while. I dont think hes trying to divide us, but rather convince us that womens issues arent important to women? I agree about the 1950s thing. It seems for some here (not necessarily OP) the Democratic Party tent got large enough and civil rights got expanded enough at some point in the last century. This election results are being used in way too many topics to place blame on marginalized groups while we give a pass to white America as if we assume its invariably majority sexist or racist.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I took a Rutgers-Eagleton class on Woman & Politics and a solid 45% of women voted paternalistic since 1974.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2024
#12
Yes, but one that is offset by the larger gender bias men have towards women.
TheBlackAdder
Nov 2024
#91
And yet, somehow, the candidate or the campaign team or the party elites and all of their decisions
Seeking Serenity
Nov 2024
#8
Come up with some meaningful strategies to do that and I'm right there with you...
Wounded Bear
Nov 2024
#15
Sadly, that's what we'll have to do. Thankfully, there are a few of them out there...
Wounded Bear
Nov 2024
#92
Trump supporters and his campaign made it very clear that this was a movement against women
Quiet Em
Nov 2024
#23
I don't get how "out of fear" works, they can vote for whoever & tell hubby the voted for the orangutang, right?
EX500rider
Nov 2024
#66
Mass deportations and insane tariffs have a zero percent chance of not increasing food prices
TheKentuckian
Nov 2024
#69
As we're hauled off to the gulag we'll be seen screaming at each other, "It's your fault!!!"
jalan48
Nov 2024
#32
" Instead, they describe never ending competition over every little personal detail and a tendency
Quiet Em
Nov 2024
#38
Can you believe this shit? Next they'll be saying we're upset because our wombs are moving around.
Scrivener7
Nov 2024
#97
Maybe the reasons women vote for Trump and the reasons men do are not the same.
milestogo
Nov 2024
#96
Anybody notice that there are a lot threads lately masquerading as "election analysis," but which are just
Scrivener7
Nov 2024
#101
" Instead, they describe never ending competition over every little personal detail and a tendency to tear each other do
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Nov 2024
#107
As compared to Biden, Harris lost more men, more minorities, younger voters, and low-income voters
Ms. Toad
Nov 2024
#117