Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Following Types of Statements Are Not Information, Nor Facts [View all]MineralMan
(147,605 posts)14. Yes. That is what I was asking.
But I still don't know what you mean by "factional." Did you mean "fictional?"
I can only respond usefully to questions I can understand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thinking that the elections officials in all those states were all in on it is a tough idea to swallow.
Fish700
Sunday
#5
Yep, hard to believe he and the rethugs would suddenly stop cheating. We all know trump has cheated all his life...
brush
Sunday
#11
Unfortunately those audits and recounts are only concerned with "close margins"...
Think. Again.
Sunday
#34
Evidence that won't and can't be found without audits and recounts that look for it.
Think. Again.
Sunday
#41
"Trump made the same claims in 2020" and what happened 4 years later, HE WON. Anger drives turnout. Let them believe it
krawhitham
Sunday
#22
The writer of at least some of those statements was calling for a recount of paper ballots in the swing states,
pnwmom
Sunday
#28
we should never doubt the stupidity of the ameriKan voter, no other excuse needed. nt
yaesu
Sunday
#40
Evidence is obtained by investigation, not by presuming all is as it should be.
Hermit-The-Prog
Sunday
#52