Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This was actually tweeted by JD Vance this evening. Yours to caption...or psychoanalyze. [View all]karynnj
(60,015 posts)75. In addition to the strangeness, I hate that map
That map has been used whether Republicans win or lose to show that "most of America" is Republican. The best counter I have seen is a 3 dimensional map that shows population density putting "skyscrapers" in places like NYC. This makes the map show that the amount of red and blue are about the same - a far more accurate view. It also, with a little thought shows that they have more of the rural areas while we have the urban areas. Note, neither of these points are new, but the overall visual corrects the misleading visual of the map shown.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This was actually tweeted by JD Vance this evening. Yours to caption...or psychoanalyze. [View all]
highplainsdem
Nov 28
OP
Serving our country up like a turkey on a platter to all the pretty white people.
Midnight Writer
Nov 28
#1
That shot of trump always reminds me of Alfred E. Neuman. Vance looks like most of the ass kissing
Silent Type
Nov 28
#17
Ironically, the original Norman Rockwell painting illustrated and promoted one of FDR's
Tanuki
Nov 28
#29
That map advances the idea that land votes and people do not. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 28
#41