General Discussion

pnwmom

(109,638 posts)

19. Why should "convincing proof" be needed before an audit is done? In my state we ROUTINELY as part of the NORMAL process

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Sun Dec 1, 2024, 05:47 PM

Dec 1

perform audits. We have all paper ballots and they take a sample of them and recount them by hand. If the result didn't match the machine tabulation, then all the ballots would be recounted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Doremus Attilatheblond phylny

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

John Pavlovitz: I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do not believe this election rslt would hold up to a forensic audit [View all] Dennis Donovan Dec 1 OP

Believe you are correct. republianmushroom Dec 1 #1

There wont be any proof unless it is investigated. hadEnuf Dec 1 #2

They would appear to be just like Republicans if they contested the election bucolic_frolic Dec 1 #3

We learned in 2022 Trump's team DID breach the Georgia election over a period of days. A group of computer scientists pnwmom Dec 1 #22

We got suckered Cirsium Dec 1 #4

"And when we fight, we win" ??? MagickMuffin Dec 1 #5

"And when we don't, we lose." Kid Berwyn Dec 1 #6

We almost never do when it matters most, and it's fucking infuriating. Karasu Dec 1 #10

Nothing ever happens Seeking Serenity Dec 3 #69

Count swing state ballots now !!!!!!!!!! Do it. Trueblue1968 Dec 1 #7

"We need to look Forward, not Backwards" Shipwack Dec 1 #8

It wasn't a "shellacking" by any metric, whether one accepts the results or not. Karasu Dec 1 #9

I corrected it. Dennis Donovan Dec 1 #12

sounds no different than the loonies on the right in 2020. WarGamer Dec 1 #11

Yes, they successfully trained us not to question election results no matter how sketchy pnwmom Dec 1 #21

What's sketchy about it? HereForTheParty Dec 1 #29

The Trump team breach of the voting system in Georgia which was discovered in 2022 has given them 4 years pnwmom Dec 1 #44

were they all 'loonies on the left' stillcool Dec 3 #52

"but every Presidential election since at least 2000 has had questionable results" Polybius Dec 3 #58

how many people were purged from the rolls stillcool Dec 3 #67

But then... GiqueCee Dec 1 #13

The bullet ballots SickOfTheOnePct Dec 1 #28

How does the vote count prove that? nt pnwmom Dec 1 #45

Simple math SickOfTheOnePct Dec 1 #48

Post removed Post removed Dec 1 #14

I feel a recount would be good Sea A Chell Dec 1 #15

Someone would have to pay for the recounts though Polybius Dec 3 #59

I believe Democrats are too afraid oldmanlynn Dec 1 #16

Is there like a head Democrat or something who we think is going to see one of these recount posts and think.. Fish700 Dec 1 #17

A simple hand recount would assure either way ... aggiesal Dec 1 #18

Why should "convincing proof" be needed before an audit is done? In my state we ROUTINELY as part of the NORMAL process pnwmom Dec 1 #19

Don't know which state you are in, but... reACTIONary Dec 1 #25

What we need to dig into is... FoggyLake Dec 1 #20

Because the election wasn't close? Polybius Dec 3 #64

That's right, The Democratic Party and it's Army of lawyers are just too stupid to see what is Wiz Imp Dec 1 #23

Thanks! reACTIONary Dec 1 #26

So... the answer is to allow a dictatorship to take hold.... FoggyLake Dec 3 #49

Thanks for proving my point Wiz Imp Dec 3 #56

I wonder - DeeDeeNY Dec 1 #24

How to tell everyone you are a conspiracy theorist.... reACTIONary Dec 1 #27

Im not a conspiracy theorist but i do not believe 911 happened the way the government says ColinC Dec 1 #32

Too many "nots" for me... reACTIONary Dec 1 #39

I dont not not-believe it. ColinC Dec 1 #40

You've tied me in knots. reACTIONary Dec 1 #42

I have not tied you in knots! But perhaps i have not not tied you in nots? ColinC Dec 1 #43

Don't not stop! reACTIONary Dec 1 #46

I believe in a couple myself, such as the JFK conspiracy with LHO not acting alone Polybius Dec 3 #60

I'm not an x, almost inevitably is followed by x EdmondDantes_ Dec 3 #65

Stating it doesn't make it true biophile Dec 4 #70

PA had a recount. ColinC Dec 1 #30

I don't know about a recount, but PA... reACTIONary Dec 1 #35

I was wrong. There was not a recount... ColinC Dec 1 #41

Casey stopped it Polybius Dec 3 #61

Yeah that seems to be the case. I think it is more than clear that Casey would have likely lost more votes in a recount ColinC Dec 3 #68

We lost. I'm not wasting time on this bullshit. themaguffin Dec 1 #31

Thanks! Me either, except... reACTIONary Dec 1 #36

I think many Democrats may be a little quick in thinking that Trump would not and did not cheat... kentuck Dec 1 #33

Oh he "cheated" alright. But all the ways he did were pretty much legal ColinC Dec 1 #34

Right On !!! reACTIONary Dec 1 #37

So where is our forensic audit? Meowmee Dec 1 #38

choose a state stillcool Dec 3 #54

I am with Pavlovitz. hamsterjill Dec 1 #47

I'm right there with you. lees1975 Dec 3 #57

Why did he tell his voters they would not need to vote again? Dem4life1234 Dec 3 #50

You're correct. You sound like a Conspiracy Theorist! Fish700 Dec 3 #51

Doesn't matter Bettie Dec 3 #53

I believe this. phylny Dec 3 #55

Why? Polybius Dec 3 #62

Yours is a good question. phylny Dec 3 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author tenderfoot Dec 3 #63