Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ck4829

(36,122 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2024, 04:35 PM Dec 4

Wait, why are we all assuming that UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot by someone denied coverage [View all]

or a relative of someone denied coverage?

I guess I'll be the first to suggest that he...

* Brought all the shareholders to a meeting, sat them all down, and showed them this story titled 'Anthem Insurance issues new edict to cap anesthesia coverage at a time limit', and he could have said "Now this is some bull right here, we will NEVER participate in such dystopian nonsense as this", nothing was stopping his brain from doing that, and that would have definitely ticked off shareholders and Anthem as well. Could have hypothetically happened.

* Said that in a call that the idea of "menstrual surveillance" was absolutely asinine and that he would have devoted UHC resources to a legal fund protecting the medical and insurance records that will fight to protect every file from being ogled over by prosecutors looking to investigate miscarriages. That would have also made shareholders absolutely angry if he planned on doing just that. It could have happened, right?

* Shared this report with his department in research titled 'Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: ‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'' and said "WHOA! This is unconscionable, guys! This is not only out of some evil nightmare, this flies in the face of what insurance should be about! Let's start supporting ways to get rid of diseases once and for all!" I'm sure Goldman Sachs could afford a hitman.

* Summoned up all the other health insurance CEOs and administrators in hospitals and said "Hey, hey, hey... did you know that the United State spends more on healthcare than every other western/global north country and yet does not have the life expectancy to go with that? Just look at this! This is not acceptable, my dudes! "World's greatest healthcare system" HAS to mean something! And if it doesn't change, and change soon, then I am going to start naming names to the public! Patients have to start coming first, this is unacceptable!" Nothing was stopping his brain from forming those words. And those words and promises for action might have caused someone else in the healthcare field to send someone after him. Could have happened.

I might also be a Kryptonian, but one of these examples of him doing the right and decent thing could have totally happened and that is what led to his death. So it seems a little hasty to assume it was someone denied coverage or a relative of someone denied coverage.

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is not clear. That said, his wife reported his receiving threats. hlthe2b Dec 4 #1
Then she was totally in on it. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 4 #17
Maybe. I see it as being a highly upset insured member who may have been denied for a family member hlthe2b Dec 4 #25
The shooting will inspire a Law & Order episode. sop Dec 4 #26
Looks like they have a pretty good photo of his eyes. (He looks like my old neighbor) Hassin Bin Sober Dec 4 #38
Of course he would. But that doesn't mean much. People like that often receive threats and most are not acted upon. LeftInTX Dec 4 #35
Look at these denial stats LetMyPeopleVote Dec 4 #2
Yes, I am aware of that. ck4829 Dec 4 #12
Subtlety and irony just flew right by a lot of people, apparently. Nt lostnfound Dec 5 #40
Could have been someone closer to home malaise Dec 4 #3
I think it had to do Henry203 Dec 4 #4
I don't think anyone is assuming anything. yardwork Dec 4 #5
It's NY. Maybe someone wanted the stock to go down. /nt bucolic_frolic Dec 4 #6
Of course those could have happened biophile Dec 4 #7
Given the statistics on who murders and why, the most likely isn't that he was killed for his work as the CEO EdmondDantes_ Dec 4 #32
it's best to label things as satire on this site honestly WhiskeyGrinder Dec 4 #8
Laughing here Cirsium Dec 4 #20
I still believe a "satire" or "sarcasm" label is ... Whiskeytide Dec 4 #36
A simpler explanation is preferred, all other factors being equal. nt. Voltaire2 Dec 4 #9
Whoever the assassin is, it was done pretty cleanly for an amateur Dennis Donovan Dec 4 #10
Someone else here posted a couple of hours ago that ... Whiskeytide Dec 4 #37
The video shows the shooter using a suppressor (aka silencer) on the pistol. sop Dec 4 #11
Yet, apparently he had rack the pistol for each shot. A professional would own a better pistol, I'd think. Silent Type Dec 4 #18
Subsonic rounds often do not have enough power sarisataka Dec 4 #21
After the first shot the shooter didn't pull the slide back, it looked like the gun jammed and didn't fully chamber sop Dec 4 #23
Yeah. Not sure about going rate for an assassination is nowadays, but he should have added Silent Type Dec 4 #24
Sounds like a pro orangecrush Dec 4 #30
Must create a narrative and stick with it regardless the facts. Sneederbunk Dec 4 #13
There are facts already? Think. Again. Dec 4 #19
It appears to be a professional hit. But who knows at Klarkashton Dec 4 #14
I agree, that looked professional obamanut2012 Dec 4 #15
Because the scumbag promised to provide medical insurance coverage,... magicarpet Dec 4 #16
Recommended Cirsium Dec 4 #22
Like JFK's plans to pull US troops out of Vietnam? Bo Zarts Dec 4 #27
OK. But where do you think police will start to look for the shooter? Grins Dec 4 #28
We won't know anything until they catch the guy and that's an IF they catch him. Xolodno Dec 4 #29
They never caught the individual who planted pipe bombs in DC the night before January 6. sop Dec 4 #33
They won't catch him, he's a time traveler. I recognize the kit. hunter Dec 5 #41
For the record, I absolutely am not assuming that. NT Mike 03 Dec 4 #31
I thought it might have been a disgruntled shareholder nitpicked Dec 4 #34
It's merely a possibility. BlueTsunami2018 Dec 4 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wait, why are we all assu...