Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So is vigilantism now the preferred way of making a statement or enacting change? [View all]milestogo
(18,274 posts)20. I've watched some westerns set in 19th century America
and sometimes the whole town would go after a person who had committed a murder. Usually they got it right, but in those days it just wasn't a very tight system. I can definitely see how people got caught up in vigilantism, because the system of laws just wasn't workable yet.
I'm not saying its workable now. But surely there are more options than stalking someone and gunning them down. Because once it starts, this kind of behavior keeps spreading and never ends.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So is vigilantism now the preferred way of making a statement or enacting change? [View all]
milestogo
Dec 5
OP
Are you saying you're seeing lots of DUers going out and shooting people? Do tell. Otherwise, if you're
Scrivener7
Dec 5
#23
American judges have made it clear that the law does not apply to rich white males.
Irish_Dem
Dec 5
#3
Is jailing those that can't pay their medical debt the preferred method of collection?
tenderfoot
Dec 5
#9
Understanding and empathizing with somebody's motives is not the same as endorsing their actions.
Voltaire2
Dec 5
#12
Asimov was a serial sexual harasser so I'm not sure everyone holds him in the same regard as you do.
BannonsLiver
Dec 5
#32
Probably a last resort for a few that feel powerless to change things any other way. nt
2 Meow Momma
Dec 5
#15
I agree. But, his act Will save no lives. The CEO will be replaced by another moneymaker.
Ping Tung
Dec 5
#39
Appears so. Maybe the government ought to get it's act together and enact a viable healthcare system
Silent Type
Dec 5
#16
The dead man made deliberate decisions that killed a lot of people on the daily.
onecaliberal
Dec 5
#28
Not the "preferred" way, but it appears to be electorally beneficial to Retrumplicans
maxrandb
Dec 5
#34