Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

SheltieLover

(60,155 posts)
Sat Dec 21, 2024, 01:58 AM Yesterday

Some, but not all of what the rat fuckers cut re: healthcare [View all]

https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/18/politics/government-funding-bill-congress-explainer/index.html

Zero mention of the early detection funding for breast & cervical cancers.

There are LOTS of things they omitted 8n order to screw taxpayers & enrich themselves.

Still hunting for what happened to the rest of the 190 million cut from the health package. The way I am reading this, 12.6 million was approved when saved by Dem Senate. Where us the rest of the $190 million?

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here is a comment on that link I gave you. Doesn't applegrove Yesterday #1
Ty, but here is NBC link stating some, but not all the peds cancer research funding passed in senate SheltieLover Yesterday #3
Damn MAGA. Women and children are expendable to Trump applegrove Yesterday #4
From STATnews. 5Peds Cancer messures cut from house bill SheltieLover Yesterday #10
Not easy to find anything on it. applegrove Yesterday #13
Not when our only sources of info are not sharing pertinent facts SheltieLover Yesterday #16
Here: applegrove Yesterday #18
But Sen Kaine said it was much narrower in scope & much less money SheltieLover Yesterday #20
And expendable to Maga MadameButterfly Yesterday #19
Absolutely! SheltieLover Yesterday #22
He's nominated the first Tickle Yesterday #32
Yeah, women's lives not as heartrending as childrens' MadameButterfly Yesterday #11
Right SheltieLover Yesterday #14
Agreed that it isn't enough. They found a way to restore MadameButterfly Yesterday #15
Awwww. Thx SheltieLover Yesterday #25
Thanks for explaining that MadameButterfly Yesterday #9
They no doubt did the best they could SheltieLover Yesterday #17
It's what is NOT being said thst is most important here. MadameButterfly Yesterday #21
Absolutely! THANK YOU! SheltieLover Yesterday #23
Thank you for what you are doing and please continue MadameButterfly Yesterday #24
Tyvm SheltieLover Yesterday #26
So many peopole's'lives/livehihoods at stake MadameButterfly Yesterday #27
Tonights Heather Cox Richardson goes into a bit more applegrove Yesterday #2
Msm won't tell the damned truth! SheltieLover Yesterday #5
It seems pretty vague everywhere. Thanks. applegrove Yesterday #6
Congress misses opportunity [REFUSES!] to fund cancer research SheltieLover Yesterday #7
Yes it is. SheltieLover Yesterday #8
Does that mean no coverage for mammograms etc? Meowmee Yesterday #12
That's what I'm trying to find out SheltieLover Yesterday #28
I'll have to read it later. I'm really tired. Meowmee Yesterday #29
Take a look on CNN for all that was CUT from the bill! SheltieLover Yesterday #30
I will Meowmee Yesterday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some, but not all of what...