Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SheltieLover

(60,148 posts)
7. Congress misses opportunity [REFUSES!] to fund cancer research
Sat Dec 21, 2024, 02:49 AM
Yesterday
https://www.fightcancer.org/releases/congress-misses-critical-opportunity-prioritize-cancer-prevention-and-access-care

This is what I'd seen before. Zero mention of it now.

“Additionally, the package would have reauthorized the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) through 2028 based on language from the bipartisan SCREENS for Cancer Act. The NBCCEDP provides free and low-cost critical breast and cervical cancer screenings, follow-up, diagnosis and treatment referral services to people who need them the most. Early detection of breast and cervical cancers through screening is key to improving survival rates and reducing mortality by finding cancer at an early stage when treatment is more effective and less expensive.

“Thousands of ACS CAN volunteers from across the country and political spectrum have devoted countless hours to advocating for these lifesaving policies and are no doubt disappointed with the lack of action. Cancer patients and their families count on Congress to prioritize critical policies that reduce barriers to the health care they need.

“We call on the 119th Congress to immediately revisit these important pieces of legislation when they convene in January, as well as provide the highest possible funding for cancer research and prevention through the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

Still on it, but I'm sure repugs cut it. Something happened to cause the amount to decrease from $190 million to $12.6 millions!

Note: paraphrased subject because all I keep getting is option to translate.



On edit: this was prior to whatever Senate passed. Posted only to show the scope of the original, which has shrunk from $190 mill to $12.6 mill!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here is a comment on that link I gave you. Doesn't applegrove Yesterday #1
Ty, but here is NBC link stating some, but not all the peds cancer research funding passed in senate SheltieLover Yesterday #3
Damn MAGA. Women and children are expendable to Trump applegrove Yesterday #4
From STATnews. 5Peds Cancer messures cut from house bill SheltieLover Yesterday #10
Not easy to find anything on it. applegrove Yesterday #13
Not when our only sources of info are not sharing pertinent facts SheltieLover Yesterday #16
Here: applegrove Yesterday #18
But Sen Kaine said it was much narrower in scope & much less money SheltieLover Yesterday #20
And expendable to Maga MadameButterfly Yesterday #19
Absolutely! SheltieLover Yesterday #22
He's nominated the first Tickle 22 hrs ago #32
Yeah, women's lives not as heartrending as childrens' MadameButterfly Yesterday #11
Right SheltieLover Yesterday #14
Agreed that it isn't enough. They found a way to restore MadameButterfly Yesterday #15
Awwww. Thx SheltieLover Yesterday #25
Thanks for explaining that MadameButterfly Yesterday #9
They no doubt did the best they could SheltieLover Yesterday #17
It's what is NOT being said thst is most important here. MadameButterfly Yesterday #21
Absolutely! THANK YOU! SheltieLover Yesterday #23
Thank you for what you are doing and please continue MadameButterfly Yesterday #24
Tyvm SheltieLover 23 hrs ago #26
So many peopole's'lives/livehihoods at stake MadameButterfly 23 hrs ago #27
Tonights Heather Cox Richardson goes into a bit more applegrove Yesterday #2
Msm won't tell the damned truth! SheltieLover Yesterday #5
It seems pretty vague everywhere. Thanks. applegrove Yesterday #6
Congress misses opportunity [REFUSES!] to fund cancer research SheltieLover Yesterday #7
Yes it is. SheltieLover Yesterday #8
Does that mean no coverage for mammograms etc? Meowmee Yesterday #12
That's what I'm trying to find out SheltieLover 22 hrs ago #28
I'll have to read it later. I'm really tired. Meowmee 22 hrs ago #29
Take a look on CNN for all that was CUT from the bill! SheltieLover 22 hrs ago #30
I will Meowmee 22 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some, but not all of what...»Reply #7