Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(123,584 posts)
18. Here:
Sat Dec 21, 2024, 03:17 AM
Yesterday

Senate funds kids cancer research after it’s nixed from CR

AL WEAVER

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/house/5049988-house-republicans-government-shutdown/amp/

The Senate late on Friday night unanimously passed $190 million in funding for pediatric cancer research after it was stripped from the initial stopgap spending package.

As Senate leaders were trying to strike a time agreement for the continuing resolution, the upper chamber separately passed the legislation — the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act 2.0 — via voice vote.

Democrats were angry that it had been removed from the bipartisan package initially. It passed the House in March.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here is a comment on that link I gave you. Doesn't applegrove Yesterday #1
Ty, but here is NBC link stating some, but not all the peds cancer research funding passed in senate SheltieLover Yesterday #3
Damn MAGA. Women and children are expendable to Trump applegrove Yesterday #4
From STATnews. 5Peds Cancer messures cut from house bill SheltieLover Yesterday #10
Not easy to find anything on it. applegrove Yesterday #13
Not when our only sources of info are not sharing pertinent facts SheltieLover Yesterday #16
Here: applegrove Yesterday #18
But Sen Kaine said it was much narrower in scope & much less money SheltieLover Yesterday #20
And expendable to Maga MadameButterfly Yesterday #19
Absolutely! SheltieLover Yesterday #22
He's nominated the first Tickle 23 hrs ago #32
Yeah, women's lives not as heartrending as childrens' MadameButterfly Yesterday #11
Right SheltieLover Yesterday #14
Agreed that it isn't enough. They found a way to restore MadameButterfly Yesterday #15
Awwww. Thx SheltieLover Yesterday #25
Thanks for explaining that MadameButterfly Yesterday #9
They no doubt did the best they could SheltieLover Yesterday #17
It's what is NOT being said thst is most important here. MadameButterfly Yesterday #21
Absolutely! THANK YOU! SheltieLover Yesterday #23
Thank you for what you are doing and please continue MadameButterfly Yesterday #24
Tyvm SheltieLover Yesterday #26
So many peopole's'lives/livehihoods at stake MadameButterfly Yesterday #27
Tonights Heather Cox Richardson goes into a bit more applegrove Yesterday #2
Msm won't tell the damned truth! SheltieLover Yesterday #5
It seems pretty vague everywhere. Thanks. applegrove Yesterday #6
Congress misses opportunity [REFUSES!] to fund cancer research SheltieLover Yesterday #7
Yes it is. SheltieLover Yesterday #8
Does that mean no coverage for mammograms etc? Meowmee Yesterday #12
That's what I'm trying to find out SheltieLover 23 hrs ago #28
I'll have to read it later. I'm really tired. Meowmee 23 hrs ago #29
Take a look on CNN for all that was CUT from the bill! SheltieLover 23 hrs ago #30
I will Meowmee 23 hrs ago #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some, but not all of what...»Reply #18