General Discussion

First of all, I give the person or persons behind this credit for presenting actual real data that can be analyzed, Something that Palast and others did not do. The biggest weakness however, is that while they are able to show that some results seemed suspicious based on prior history, they still cannot connect it to any specific actions that would prove the results are not legitimate.

They mention the bomb threats, which I believe unquestionably were made to interfere with the election results. Unfortunately, they do not present any evidence that those bomb threats actually impacted the results in those locations where they were made. It may make sense that they had an impact, but they only show 2020 results for those locations, not 2024 so one can't even make a cursory analysis of any potential impact.

They say this was the first election in 40 years where one candidate won all swing states. The problem with that is that the swing states in 2024 were not all swing states in 1984 or 2004 or necessarily any other year. Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina were solid Republican, not swing states until very recently. Considering Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin all voted Democratic in every election between 1992 & 2012, it's hard to call them swing states during that period as well. States that were swing states in past year but not 2024 include Florida, Iowa and Ohio. I think this renders the swing state theory as they present it rather meaningless.

Finally, the OP says "recounts in two or three well-chosen swing states and asked her voters to pay for it, and if those recounts had happened, then I'm convinced that a coup would have been exposed." Unfortunately, none of the data presented here implies that a recount would have yielded a different result. If the data here is evidence of election tampering, it seems to be with interference which would not be uncovered by a simple recount. Besides, I firmly believe if there were any remotely solid evidence that a recount could have changed a result, a recount would have been called for and paid for.