Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(91,716 posts)
17. we can have that fight
Tue Feb 18, 2025, 01:11 AM
Feb 18

...what we won't have is Trump, making unilateral decisions about spending (or not spending).

And,don't forget that it only takes THREE republicans in the house to help a unanimous Dem minority block things like SS and Medicaid cuts.

And also realize that USAID iswn't just a beneficient enterprise that Congress has supported for decades and decades, since Kennedy.

It's about BUSINESS interests which are not divorced from the republicans in the majority who are essentially employees of the corporations and money men who put them there.

Those are THEIR interests, as well, with at least 47 states directly involved in making the product of their constituents available to USAID - and that's not a donation, it's real dollars that these states will lose, that these politicians will hear about.

Now, USAID spending comprises just 0.3 percent of total federal spending. POINT THREE PERCENT.

In fiscal year 2020, USAID bought $2.1 billion of food aid from American farmers.


TWO POINT ONE BILLION! IN ONE YEAR!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I read an article today. She likely won't grant it. LeftInTX Feb 17 #1
they're talking about the temporary restraining order bigtree Feb 17 #6
I suspect there's reasons for not issuing a TRO that I as a layperson am unaware of... Hugin Feb 17 #7
putting my trust and possibly future in cilla4progress Feb 17 #2
Unfortunately, think he has authority. Even if judge rules he doesn't, trump will order data "under his name. Silent Type Feb 17 #3
he still hasn't shown a dime of fraud bigtree Feb 17 #8
He's talked BS, but I guarantee he'll report crud like $600 toilet seats, aid to some poor African Silent Type Feb 17 #10
ALL of those are in the purview of Congress bigtree Feb 18 #13
So trump/Musk says, you [Congress] appropriated money for HIV help, but most went to local strongmen. Silent Type Feb 18 #15
we can have that fight bigtree Feb 18 #17
Yeah, if he cuts SS or Medicare. He doesn't have that political power. He probably does have power Silent Type Feb 18 #18
well, cuts will have to go through appropriations, won't they? bigtree Feb 18 #19
You'd think someone recently leaking confidential NSA data would qualify as imminent. TheBlackAdder Feb 17 #4
Yeah, I know.... LeftInTX Feb 17 #9
I trust judge Chutkan gab13by13 Feb 17 #5
I don't trust anybody any more NT Ex Lurker Feb 18 #12
Whatever happens, she will order Musk be jailed for contempt before it is over. MichMan Feb 18 #11
he is an arrogant fuck bigtree Feb 18 #14
TY! Bc I just heard in passing (radio) that she Hadn't, and I got a little freaked....then got ditracted by other stuff. electric_blue68 Feb 18 #16
Preemptive excuse making. BannonsLiver Feb 18 #20
No trust left in the US justice system. Justice matters. Feb 18 #21
Kick! liberalla Feb 19 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't freak if Chutkan do...»Reply #17