Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,793 posts)
19. well, cuts will have to go through appropriations, won't they?
Tue Feb 18, 2025, 01:06 AM
Feb 2025

...and republicans still haven't gotten their shit together to even pass a budget resolution to move to reconciliation.

All they have to do is get the Senate bill to agree with the House, but the House republicans are rabid and self-immolating.

NPR:

SIMON: What are Republicans trying to resolve?

SPRUNT: Well, they're working on how they want to pass President Trump's agenda. Things he campaigned on like security along the U.S. Southern border, extending the tax cuts passed in his first Trump administration in 2017, and then other things that Trump has asked for, like extending the federal borrowing limit. And what this comes down to, in the end, is a powerful tool called budget reconciliation.

SIMON: Powerful but complicated. Why choose that option?

SPRUNT: Exactly right. Well, the short answer is it's a way for Republicans to pass legislation without Democrats. So Republicans have 53 seats in the Senate, and Democrats aren't going to support much or any of what Trump and Republicans want to do. So it's not like Republicans can rely on seven Democrats to get them over the finish line, which is what they would need a lot of normal, as we would say, legislation. So they turn to reconciliation, which is part of the budget process that makes it possible for Congress to enact legislation on taxes and spending with a simple majority and avoid the threat of a filibuster, which requires that 60 senator number to overcome.

So yes, this is complicated, and it starts with a budget resolution, which directs different committees to change spending or deficits or revenues. Those committees all write bills to achieve their specific target, and then the budget committee puts all those bills together into one big bill that cannot be filibustered. So that's what House...

...that's what House Republicans are working on right now, this blueprint for a budget resolution. But senators have their own different plan. Budget committee chairman Lindsey Graham released the Senate budget resolution on Friday ahead of a meeting last night with Trump at Mar-a-Lago.

...each chamber has competing visions of the best path forward to implement this agenda. This has been a disagreement for months now. The Senate wants to do two bills, one for the border and energy, and the other on tax cuts. They're concerned that a tax bill could be too complicated to pass quickly. And instead, they want to move forward with things that they think they can pass relatively soon and then return later this year for that second package.

But top House Republicans want to tackle the agenda with one bill that encompasses everything. They're worried if they delay the tax element, it could be jeopardized altogether.

https://www.npr.org/2025/02/08/nx-s1-5288869/house-republicans-want-to-pass-a-budget-bill-that-would-support-trumps-policies

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I read an article today. She likely won't grant it. LeftInTX Feb 2025 #1
they're talking about the temporary restraining order bigtree Feb 2025 #6
I suspect there's reasons for not issuing a TRO that I as a layperson am unaware of... Hugin Feb 2025 #7
putting my trust and possibly future in cilla4progress Feb 2025 #2
Unfortunately, think he has authority. Even if judge rules he doesn't, trump will order data "under his name. Silent Type Feb 2025 #3
he still hasn't shown a dime of fraud bigtree Feb 2025 #8
He's talked BS, but I guarantee he'll report crud like $600 toilet seats, aid to some poor African Silent Type Feb 2025 #10
ALL of those are in the purview of Congress bigtree Feb 2025 #13
So trump/Musk says, you [Congress] appropriated money for HIV help, but most went to local strongmen. Silent Type Feb 2025 #15
we can have that fight bigtree Feb 2025 #17
Yeah, if he cuts SS or Medicare. He doesn't have that political power. He probably does have power Silent Type Feb 2025 #18
well, cuts will have to go through appropriations, won't they? bigtree Feb 2025 #19
You'd think someone recently leaking confidential NSA data would qualify as imminent. TheBlackAdder Feb 2025 #4
Yeah, I know.... LeftInTX Feb 2025 #9
I trust judge Chutkan gab13by13 Feb 2025 #5
I don't trust anybody any more NT Ex Lurker Feb 2025 #12
Whatever happens, she will order Musk be jailed for contempt before it is over. MichMan Feb 2025 #11
he is an arrogant fuck bigtree Feb 2025 #14
TY! Bc I just heard in passing (radio) that she Hadn't, and I got a little freaked....then got ditracted by other stuff. electric_blue68 Feb 2025 #16
Preemptive excuse making. BannonsLiver Feb 2025 #20
No trust left in the US justice system. Justice matters. Feb 2025 #21
Kick! liberalla Feb 2025 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't freak if Chutkan do...»Reply #19