General Discussion

Their own polls must have told them they were losing, because they pulled out all the stops, showing Trump's face and mentioning him repeatedly--more often than the candidate himself (Brad Schimel). It was clear that whoever was actually running for the position was immaterial; they were simply a stand-in for Trump.

The ads ended on a really weak note--something about the "trickle down" policies of the Trump regime. If you parsed this with even a slight amount of critical thought, it became clear that what was really being said was "you peasants had better vote for this stuffed-shirt of ours, or you won't even get the few scraps we deign to throw your way!". It's really dumb to bring back Reagan-style "voodoo economics" (aka the "trickle-down" theory) after 40 years of historical experience showing that it doesn't work!