General Discussion

Your claim that you are the only one operating based on facts doesn't mean much without evidence. You could post some tweets yourself. You make a point, then it's incumbent on you to provide evidence to support that point--not expecting someone to go find tweets that bothered you.

I've read plenty of went Hogg says. I haven't seen anything close to "burn it all down." I see someone who wants the party to evolve so it can actually win. Then I see those who want incumbents to serve for life without ever being subject to a democratic challenger in a primary. They are intent on maintaining the status quo, which means to continue losing. Some are happy with a party with a 26% approval rating. That's not a rational position. Moreover, it doesn't seem to matter what those who don't want change think. Voters have chosen to exercise their own views. It's clear that voters will determine the future of the party.