Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
19. Facts certainly are spun.
Wed Jul 9, 2025, 03:49 PM
Jul 2025

Discounting all other statistics except the number or House recipients, like the total contribitions to House candidates almost double for Dems that those for Reps, and the number of recipients and the totals in the Senate, and ignoring the overall contributions, is certainly a blatant spin.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's just bribery. aocommunalpunch Jul 2025 #1
Coulda fooled me Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #2
Money so DEMs support tyrant Netanyahu ethnic cleansing of Gaza IrishBubbaLiberal Jul 2025 #3
Did it occur to you that the Dems supported by AIPAC have their own minds to Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #9
Money to support stealing land from Palestinians IrishBubbaLiberal Jul 2025 #10
Someone on Bsky telling you about someone on X saying that someone purporting to be a senior official Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #14
Long known that tyrant Netanyahu desire to steal land from Palestinians IrishBubbaLiberal Jul 2025 #15
Does it even occur to you that none of the above addresses anything about Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #22
You seems to ignore the facts..far right Netanyahu plan was always to steal land in Gaza IrishBubbaLiberal Jul 2025 #17
No, I am not ignoring the facts. I posted them for all to see. Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #20
You dont do that at all. Eko Jul 2025 #27
Huh? Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #29
AIPAC only supports pols of both parties who they know are 100% unconditional Deminpenn Jul 2025 #6
I wonder what the general election figures are dsc Jul 2025 #8
I literally posted a link to the stats that prove you wrong. Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #11
AIPAC gave more $ to Democrat members but far more GOP members of the House for example. PufPuf23 Jul 2025 #13
Facts certainly are spun. Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #19
Some see spin in multiple dimensions. PufPuf23 Jul 2025 #24
How the House numbers alone, taken out of the context of a comprehensive set of statisitics makes for a Beastly Boy Jul 2025 #25
I think Rhodes would be on more solid ground if he said AIPAC was karynnj Jul 2025 #4
Ben Rhodes saw a lot during his time in the WH Deminpenn Jul 2025 #7
I believe Ben Rhodes is an unbiased voice and not wrong mountain grammy Jul 2025 #16
Perhaps Dems might stop taking cash from corporations and PACs whose goals do not align with Dem principles... pecosbob Jul 2025 #5
Every Democratic candidate that accepted AIPAC Sewa Jul 2025 #12
Bull... The Uncommitted & Leave It Blank in MI and elsewhere... Cha Jul 2025 #18
Biden would have had the same policies if AIPAC never existed. Passages Jul 2025 #21
Idk AIPAC seems to know how to blend themselves into joe's faith's narrative questionseverything Jul 2025 #26
I understand what you mean. Passages Jul 2025 #28
I was very glad Rhodes never found a job in the Biden White House. tritsofme Jul 2025 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AIPAC is part of the cons...»Reply #19